Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment01:25

Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment

2.1K
Transmission-based precautions are for patients infected or suspected to be infected (or colonized) with organisms posing a significant risk to others. The transmission precautions include airborne and protective environment precautions.
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
2.1K
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets01:17

Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets

5.0K
Transmission-based precautions are for patients known to be infected or suspected to be infected or colonized with organisms that pose a significant risk to others. Some transmission-based precautions include contact, enteric, and droplet.
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
5.0K
Standard Precaution01:26

Standard Precaution

3.3K
Standard precautions are the minimum infection control safeguards used while caring for all patients, irrespective of their disease condition. They help prevent the spread of common infectious microorganisms to healthcare workers, patients, and visitors in all healthcare settings.
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
3.3K
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures01:22

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

4.8K
Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
4.8K
Hand hygiene01:23

Hand hygiene

6.4K
Asepsis is the practice of preventing or breaking the chain of infection. The nurse employs aseptic techniques to prevent the spread of microorganisms and reduce the risk of diseases. Hand hygiene is the cornerstone of aseptic techniques and is classified into medical and surgical asepsis. Medical asepsis includes hand hygiene and the use of gloves. Surgical asepsis, or the sterile technique, refers to practices that render and keep objects and areas free of microorganisms.
Hand washing...
6.4K
Personal Protective Equipment01:20

Personal Protective Equipment

2.5K
Personal protective equipment (PPE) is unique clothing or equipment worn by an employee to minimize or prevent exposure to infectious agents. PPE creates a barrier between the employee and the infectious materials. PPE must be readily available in the patient care area. PPE includes gloves, gowns and aprons, masks and respirators, goggles, face shields, shoes, and headcovers:
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

4% Tetrasodium EDTA to Prevent Central Venous Access Device-Associated Complications: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Exploring the role of interoception in anxious traits and symptoms.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same author

Suppression of microbial burden to reduce pneumonia in critical illness: the SMURF feasibility pilot study.

Critical care (London, England)·2026
Same author

Prevalence and co-occurrence of sexually transmitted infections among heterosexual couples in southern Uganda: a population-based study.

Sexually transmitted infections·2025
Same author

Frailty and the risk of ICU-acquired infections in a randomised trial: a protocol and statistical analysis plan.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

When doctors lose their faith in medicine.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Efficient Isolation Protocol for B and T Lymphocytes from Human Palatine Tonsils
08:09

Efficient Isolation Protocol for B and T Lymphocytes from Human Palatine Tonsils

Published on: November 16, 2015

16.5K

Patient Isolation Precautions: Are They Worth It?

Elliott Sprague1, Steven Reynolds2, Peter Brindley3

  • 1University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2B7.

Canadian Respiratory Journal
|July 23, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Isolation precautions aim to prevent infections but carry risks. This review examines the costs and benefits of isolation, advocating for timely deisolation when safe.

More Related Videos

Preparation and Maintenance of Bioexclusion IsoPositive Cage Experiment for Human Fecal Transplantation into Germ-Free Mice
07:45

Preparation and Maintenance of Bioexclusion IsoPositive Cage Experiment for Human Fecal Transplantation into Germ-Free Mice

Published on: February 28, 2025

1.3K
Determining Viral Disinfection Efficacy of Hot Water Laundering
06:57

Determining Viral Disinfection Efficacy of Hot Water Laundering

Published on: June 21, 2022

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Efficient Isolation Protocol for B and T Lymphocytes from Human Palatine Tonsils
08:09

Efficient Isolation Protocol for B and T Lymphocytes from Human Palatine Tonsils

Published on: November 16, 2015

16.5K
Preparation and Maintenance of Bioexclusion IsoPositive Cage Experiment for Human Fecal Transplantation into Germ-Free Mice
07:45

Preparation and Maintenance of Bioexclusion IsoPositive Cage Experiment for Human Fecal Transplantation into Germ-Free Mice

Published on: February 28, 2025

1.3K
Determining Viral Disinfection Efficacy of Hot Water Laundering
06:57

Determining Viral Disinfection Efficacy of Hot Water Laundering

Published on: June 21, 2022

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Infection Control
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Isolation precautions are standard for minimizing pathogen transmission and hospital-acquired infections.
  • Recent evidence questions the effectiveness of isolation, highlighting associated risks.
  • These risks include direct monetary costs and less quantifiable patient-related burdens.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the risks and benefits of isolation precautions.
  • To review deisolation strategies and alternatives to current isolation practices.
  • To provide up-to-date information for optimizing patient isolation protocols.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on isolation precautions, their effectiveness, and associated costs.
  • Analysis of both quantifiable financial costs and qualitative patient-centered risks.
  • Examination of deisolation criteria and alternative infection control measures.

Main Results:

  • Isolation precautions present both financial costs and significant patient-related "costs."
  • Evidence suggests a need to re-evaluate the routine application of isolation.
  • Deisolation and alternative strategies may mitigate negative impacts.

Conclusions:

  • A balanced consideration of risks and benefits is crucial for isolation protocols.
  • The goal is to ensure isolation is used appropriately and discontinued promptly when safe.
  • Optimizing isolation practices can improve patient outcomes and system efficiency.