Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.2K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.2K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.7K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.7K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.7K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

7.2K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
7.2K
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

787
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
787

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differences in perceived travel distance from central versus peripheral optic flow are the same when standing and walking.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Cortical mechanisms for transsaccadic vision: Extrinsic and intrinsic feature updating.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

How the characteristics of a virtual environment affects the perception of travel distance through it.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Feasibility and impact of virtual reality exposure therapy on epilepsy-specific anxiety: Phase 3 of the AnxEpiVR pilot clinical trial.

Epilepsy & behavior reports·2026
Same author

Failure to replicate the Aubert-Fleischl effect.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Audio-Visual Integration in 3D Space Near the Body.

Multisensory research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K

Causal Inference for Cross-Modal Action Selection: A Computational Study in a Decision Making Framework.

Mehdi Daemi1, Laurence R Harris2, J Douglas Crawford3

  • 1Department of Biology and Neuroscience Graduate Diploma, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada; Centre for Vision Research, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada; Canadian Action and Perception NetworkToronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychology, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada.

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
|July 23, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a computational model for how the brain integrates multisensory information, using a spatiotemporal similarity measure to determine if stimuli share a common source. The model successfully predicts human behavior in cross-modal causal inference tasks.

Keywords:
causal inferencedecision-makingmultisensory integrationreport of samenesssaliency map of spacespatiotemporal similarityworking memory

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • The brain integrates multisensory information to perceive objects and events.
  • Current understanding lacks a clear mechanism for how the brain compares spatiotemporal features of sensory inputs to determine their origin.
  • This is crucial for distinguishing between single and multiple sources of stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate a computational model for cross-modal causal inference.
  • To investigate how the brain determines if visual and auditory stimuli originate from the same source.
  • To explore the role of working memory in integrating sensory information.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a computational model reducing visual and auditory data to time-varying signals.
  • Incorporated leaky integrators as working memory to retain sensory information.
  • Utilized an evidence-based decision-making framework with saliency maps and a spatiotemporal similarity measure for causal inference.

Main Results:

  • Simulations validated the model against human behavioral data in cross-modal tasks.
  • The model accurately predicted behavior in novel experiments with varying stimulus features (spatial, temporal, reliability).
  • The spatiotemporal similarity measure was confirmed as a viable criterion for causal inference.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed model provides a viable mechanism for cross-modal causal inference and target selection in the brain.
  • The spatiotemporal similarity measure is effective for inferring common or separate causes of sensory inputs.
  • The framework can be extended to other cognitive tasks limited by working memory, such as complex target selection.