Mechanistic study of chlordecone-induced endocrine disruption: Based on an adverse outcome pathway network

Lihua Yang1, Bingsheng Zhou1, Jinmiao Zha2

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China.

Chemosphere
|July 23, 2016
PubMed

Insights

Chlordecone causes endocrine disruption by interacting with estrogen and androgen receptors, affecting fish development. Current adverse outcome pathway (AOP) models need expansion for accurate chemical risk assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Toxicology
  • Endocrinology
  • Chemical Risk Assessment

Background:

  • The adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework aids chemical risk assessment and mechanistic research.
  • Understanding chlordecone's endocrine-disrupting mechanisms is crucial for risk evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the molecular initiating events (MIEs) behind chlordecone-induced endocrine disruption.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of the AOP framework in predicting chemical toxicity.

Main Methods:

  • In silico simulations predicted chlordecone's interactions with estrogen receptors (ERα, ERβ), androgen receptor (AR), and cytochrome P450 (CYP19A).
  • In vivo studies exposed rare minnow (Gobiocypris rarus) to varying chlordecone concentrations from early development to sexual maturity.

Main Results:

  • In females, elevated vitellogenin (vtg) mRNA, plasma estradiol (E2), testosterone (T), and E2/T ratio confirmed ER and CYP19A agonism as MIEs. However, decreased gonadosomatic index and ovarian degeneration suggested additional MIEs.
  • In males, increased E2/T ratio, testicular vtg mRNA, and intersex occurrence confirmed ERα and CYP19A agonism as key MIEs.
  • The study highlighted limitations of current AOPs in predicting adverse outcomes and explaining chemical mechanisms.

Conclusions:

  • Chlordecone acts as an endocrine disruptor through ER and CYP19A agonism, impacting fish reproduction.
  • The findings underscore the need for expanding AOPs and AOP networks for robust chemical risk assessment.