Paths of cognitive and language development in healthy preterm infants
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
Published on: April 19, 2017
Chiara Ionio1, Elisa Riboni2, Emanuela Confalonieri1
1CRIdee, Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università Cattolica, Milano, Italy.
Insights
Preterm infants show developmental delays compared to full-term infants, particularly in language. Age correction for prematurity is beneficial before age two, but later developmental differences persist.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Pediatrics
- Neonatology
Background:
- Premature birth is associated with heterogeneous developmental outcomes.
- Methodological factors may contribute to variability in findings.
- Understanding developmental trajectories in preterm infants is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess cognitive and linguistic performance in healthy preterm infants at 24 and 36 months corrected age using the BSID-III.
- To analyze the necessity and duration of applying age correction for prematurity.
- To evaluate developmental improvements between 24 and 36 months in preterm infants.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 75 healthy preterm infants and 69 term-born infants were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III).
- Developmental outcomes were evaluated at 24 and 36 months corrected age.
- Cognitive (COG) and language (LANG) scales were analyzed, comparing corrected age (CA) and uncorrected chronological age (UCA).
Main Results:
- Preterm infants scored significantly lower on cognitive and language scales than term infants at both 24 and 36 months (corrected and uncorrected age).
- Significant differences between CA and UCA scores were observed at 24 months for all scales and at 36 months for language scales.
- Cognitive scores improved significantly between 24 and 36 months in preterm infants. Early differences between CA and UCA scores correlated with gestational age and hospital stay.
Conclusions:
- Preterm birth is linked to poorer cognitive and language outcomes in infancy.
- Age correction for prematurity is valuable for children under two years old.
- Preterm infants remain at risk for language difficulties, even when appearing to recover cognitively, highlighting the need for continued monitoring.
Objective:
Despite the presence of many studies on difficulties related to premature birth, findings on developmental outcomes are heterogeneous. This could be explained from a biological and environmental point of view, but also from a methodological one. The aims of this study were as follows: assess cognitive and linguistic performance using the BSID-III in a population of healthy preterm infants at 24 and 36 months (corrected age); analyze whether the correction for prematurity should be applied, decide when to stop using corrected age and evaluate possible improvements between 24 and 36 months.
Methods:
Developmental outcome was assessed at 24 and 36 months (corrected age) with the BSID-III in 75 healthy preterm (GA=32.5±1.97; BW=1631.55±453.92) and 69 term-born children (GA=39.77±1.00; BW=3298.95±457.27).
Results:
Preterm infants had significantly lower scores than those of term infants in Cognitive (COG) and Language (LANG REC, LANG EC) scales of the BSID-III at both 24 and 36 months, considering both corrected (CA) and chronological (UCA) age. At 24 months, significant differences between corrected and chronological scores were found for each BSID-III scale, while at 36 months, significant differences between corrected and chronological scores were found for LANG scales. Only the scores in the COG scale were statistically different between 24 and 36 months (F=4.894, P=0.009, η(2)=0.075). Considering only the preterm sample at 24 months, the differences between CA and UCA scores in the COG scale were significantly correlated to GA (p=0.000) and days in hospital (p=0.002;), while differences between CA and UCA scores in the LANG ESP scale were significantly correlated to GA (p=0.010), days in hospital (p=0.001), and birth weight (p=0.007). At 36 months, no significant correlations were found.
Conclusions:
Preterm birth is followed by poorer cognitive and language outcomes during infancy than full-term birth. Age correction of prematurity is useful if the child is under 2 years of age; however, our findings raise concerns about the need for age correction, considering that at later ages, healthy preterm children have a higher rate of developmental delay compared with term infants. With regard to cognitive development, preterm children seem to recover from their initial disadvantage; however, with regard to linguistic development, data confirm that preterm infants are at risk for language difficulties.
Related Concept Videos
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Language and Cognition
The Nativist Approach
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
Information Processing Approach

