Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
Salivary Pepsin Lacks Sensitivity as a Diagnostic Tool to Evaluate Extraesophageal Reflux Disease
Fei Dy1, Janine Amirault2, Paul D Mitchell3
1Division of Respiratory Diseases, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Insights
Salivary pepsin testing shows low sensitivity for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children. This diagnostic method is not a reliable indicator of reflux when compared to established GERD evaluation techniques.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Diagnostic Test Evaluation
Background:
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition in children.
- Accurate diagnosis of GERD is crucial for effective management.
- Current diagnostic methods include multichannel intraluminal impedance with pH testing (pH-MII) and endoscopy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic sensitivity of salivary pepsin.
- To compare salivary pepsin performance against established GERD diagnostic standards.
Main Methods:
- Prospective recruitment of 50 children undergoing pH-MII for GERD evaluation.
- Collection of saliva for pepsin analysis using PepTest lateral flow.
- Comparison of salivary pepsin results with pH-MII, questionnaires, and endoscopic findings.
Main Results:
- 42% of patients tested positive for salivary pepsin.
- No significant differences in reflux parameters between pepsin-positive and negative groups.
- Salivary pepsin positivity did not correlate with symptoms, quality of life, or endoscopic inflammation.
Conclusions:
- Salivary pepsin measurement demonstrates low sensitivity in diagnosing pathological GERD in pediatric patients.
- Current evidence does not support salivary pepsin as a reliable standalone diagnostic tool for pediatric GERD.
Objectives:
To determine the sensitivity of salivary pepsin compared with multichannel intraluminal impedance with pH testing (pH-MII), endoscopy, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) questionnaires.
Study Design:
We prospectively recruited 50 children from Boston Children's Hospital who were undergoing pH-MII to evaluate for GERD. The patients completed 24-hour pH-MII testing, completed symptom and quality of life questionnaires, and provided a saliva specimen that was analyzed using the PepTest lateral flow test. A subset of patients also underwent bronchoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to determine the sensitivity of salivary pepsin compared with each reference standard.
Results:
Twenty-one of the 50 patients (42%) were salivary pepsin-positive, with a median salivary pepsin concentration of 10 ng/mL (IQR, 10-55 ng/mL). There was no significant difference in the distributions of acid, nonacid, total reflux episodes, full column reflux, or any other reflux variable in patients who were pepsin-positive compared with those who were pepsin-negative (P > .50). There was no significant correlation between the number of reflux episodes and pepsin concentration (P > .10). There was no positive relationship between salivary pepsin positivity, any extraesophageal symptoms or quality of life scores, or inflammation on bronchoscopy or esophagogastroduodenoscopy (P > .30).
Conclusion:
Salivary pepsin measurement has a low sensitivity for predicting pathological gastroesophageal reflux in children.
More Related Videos
08:25Construction of a Wireless-Enabled Endoscopically Implantable Sensor for pH Monitoring with Zero-Bias Schottky Diode-based Receiver
Published on: August 27, 2021
07:25Author Spotlight: A Focus on Standardized Salivary Gland Ultrasound Protocol in Connective Tissue Disease Research
Published on: October 13, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Peptic Ulcer Disease I: Introduction
An acute ulcer, marked by superficial erosion and minimal inflammation, swiftly resolves upon identifying and addressing the underlying cause. In contrast, a chronic ulcer persists, potentially eroding through the muscular wall and forming fibrous tissue.
Peptic ulcers can also be...
Pathophysiology of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Injurious Factors
In the antrum region, G cells secrete the gastrin hormone that binds to gastrin-cholecystokinin-B (CCK2) receptors on parietal and enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells in the fundic glands. Simultaneously, the vagus nerve releases acetylcholine, which binds...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease I: Meaning and Pathophysiology