Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers

Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers

Local anesthetics (LAs) block the sodium channels of nerve trunks, sensory nerve endings, and neuromuscular junctions. Although LAs can block all kinds of nerves, the sensitivity of nerve fibers differs according to nerve types and structures. LAs are known to block myelinated fibers faster than unmyelinated ones. Also, they block pain or sensory neurons at low concentrations without affecting the motor neurons involved in muscle contractions. This helps relieve labor pain without affecting the...

Excitatory and Inhibitory Effects of Neurotransmitters

Excitatory and Inhibitory Effects of Neurotransmitters

When an action potential reaches the presynaptic axon terminal, it releases neurotransmitters from the neuron into the synaptic cleft at a chemical synapse. The released neurotransmitter can be excitatory or inhibitory. The critical criteria commonly used to determine whether a molecule is a neurotransmitter at a chemical synapse are the molecule's presence in the presynaptic neuron. Second, its release is in response to strong presynaptic depolarization. And lastly, the presence of...

Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action

Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action

Depolarizing blockers act on skeletal muscle fibers' membranes and induce their depolarization. Most depolarizing blockers have two quaternary N+ atoms that bind the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and cause neuromuscular blockade within minutes.
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Simulating object recognition with the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) model.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same author

Online and in-person stress induction in a quasi-avoidance-based Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer task.

Learning & behavior·2026

Same author

Effects of manipulating prefrontal activity and dopamine D1 receptor signaling in an appetitive feature-negative discrimination learning task.

Behavioral neuroscience·2024

Same author

Sleep in the wild: the importance of individual effects and environmental conditions on sleep behaviour in wild boar.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2024

Same author

Attitudes to the use of animals in biomedical research: Effects of stigma and selected research project summaries.

PloS one·2023

Same author

Neonate personality affects early-life resource acquisition in a large social mammal.

Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Blocking by fixed and variable stimuli: Effects of stimulus distribution on blocking.

Dómhnall J Jennings¹, Charlotte Bonardi²

¹a Institute of Neuroscience , Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)

|July 26, 2016

Summary

Fixed cues produced blocking in rats, but variable cues did not. This suggests fixed cues may reach a more stable associative strength, impacting learning and memory processes.

Keywords:

Associative learning Blocking Rats Stimulus distribution form Timing

More Related Videos

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

Area of Science:

Behavioral neuroscience
Animal learning theory
Associative learning

Background:

Blocking is a phenomenon in associative learning where a previously learned cue prevents new learning.
The role of cue duration (fixed vs. variable) in blocking has not been extensively studied.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether fixed-duration cues are more effective than variable-duration cues in producing blocking.
To compare the associative strength of fixed and variable duration cues in rats.

Main Methods:

Rats were trained with fixed (F) and variable (V) duration cues paired with food.
Subsequently, F was paired with stimulus X, and V with stimulus Y.
Test phases examined responding to X and Y in blocking and overshadowing control groups.

Main Results:

Blocking of stimulus X, paired with the fixed-duration cue (F), was observed.
No evidence of blocking was found for stimulus Y, paired with the variable-duration cue (V).
Control groups confirmed the blocking and overshadowing effects.

Conclusions:

Fixed-duration cues appear more effective in establishing associative strength and producing blocking compared to variable-duration cues.
This difference may be due to fixed cues reaching a higher, more stable asymptote of associative strength.
Findings contribute to understanding the nuances of cue properties in associative learning.