Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
Published on: September 20, 2020
Effectiveness of a Proactive Primary Care Program on Preserving Daily Functioning of Older People: A Cluster
Nienke Bleijenberg1, Irene Drubbel2, Marieke J Schuurmans3
1Department of General Practice, Nursing Science and Sports Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands. N.Bleijenberg@umcutrecht.nl.
Objectives:
To determine the effectiveness of a proactive primary care program on the daily functioning of older people in primary care.
Design:
Single-blind, three-arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.
Setting:
Primary care setting, 39 general practices in the Netherlands.
Participants:
Community-dwelling people aged 60 and older (N = 3,092).
Interventions:
A frailty screening intervention using routine electronic medical record data to identify older people at risk of adverse events followed by usual care from a general practitioner; after the screening intervention, a nurse-led care program consisting of a comprehensive geriatric assessment, evidence-based care planning, care coordination, and follow-up; usual care.
Measurements:
Primary outcome was daily functioning measured using the Katz-15 (6 activities of daily living (ADLs), 8 instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), one mobility item (range 0-15)); higher scores indicate greater dependence. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, primary care consultations, hospital admissions, emergency department visits, nursing home admissions, and mortality.
Results:
The participants in both intervention arms had less decline in daily functioning than those in the usual care arm at 12 months (mean Katz-15 score: screening arm, 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.77-1.97; screening and nurse-led care arm, 1.88, 95% CI = 1.80-1.96; control group, 2.03, 95% CI = 1.92-2.13; P = .03). No differences in quality of life were observed.
Conclusion:
Participants in both intervention groups had less decline than those in the control group at 1-year follow-up. Despite the statistically significant effect, the clinical relevance is uncertain at this point because of the small differences. Greater customizing of the intervention combined with prolonged follow-up may lead to more-robust results.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

