Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026
Detection of a Circulating MicroRNA Custom Panel in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Published on: March 14, 2019
Soluble c-Met Levels Correlated With Tissue c-Met Protein Expression in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung
Hong-Fei Gao1, An-Na Li2, Jin-Ji Yang2
1Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China; Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Background:
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization are reliable methods for identifying c-Met protein expression or c-Met gene amplification. However, each technique requires a high-quality tissue sample, which might not be available. The aim of the present study was to investigate the correlation between the soluble c-Met level and tissue c-Met protein expression and the relationship between these markers and patient prognosis.
Materials And Methods:
In 198 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, tumor tissue c-Met expression was determined using IHC according to the H score criteria. Positivity was defined as ≥ 50% of cells with strong staining (IHC 3+). The concentration of c-Met protein in paired plasma samples was measured using a human soluble c-Met quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit, and the predictive value was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Results:
Of the 198 patients, 140 (70.7%) had tissue c-Met- findings and 58 (29.3%) tissue c-Met+ findings. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed 67.2% specificity and 65.0% sensitivity for predicting tissue c-Met positivity at a plasma c-Met cutoff of 766 ng/mL. The correlation between the soluble c-Met level and tissue c-Met protein expression was significant (Pearson's r = 0.309; P < .001). Patients with high soluble c-Met levels (> 766 ng/mL) had poorer overall survival than patients with low soluble c-Met levels (9.5 vs. 22.2 months; P < .001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated the same result (hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.334-3.446; P = .002).
Conclusion:
A significant correlation was found between the plasma soluble c-Met levels and tissue c-Met protein expression in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A high level of soluble c-Met was associated with a poor prognosis.
