Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
Contemporary comparison of aortofemoral bypass to alternative inflow procedures in the Veteran population
James T McPhee1, Arin Madenci2, Joseph Raffetto3
1Division of Vascular Surgery, Veteran Affairs Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, Mass; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.
Insights
Aortofemoral bypass (AFB) shows higher early complications and mortality trends compared to alternative inflow procedures (AIPs) for claudication. However, by 90 days, both surgical options demonstrate similar mortality rates in patients with inflow disease.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Surgical Outcomes
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Peripheral artery disease (PAD) causing claudication necessitates vascular inflow reconstruction.
- Aortofemoral bypass (AFB) and alternative inflow procedures (AIPs) are established surgical options.
- Lack of contemporary, multi-institution comparisons between AFB and AIPs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of aortofemoral bypass (AFB) versus alternative inflow procedures (AIPs) in patients with claudication.
- To identify differences in mortality and postoperative complications between AFB and AIPs.
- To assess the independent impact of inflow procedure type on patient mortality.
Main Methods:
- Propensity-matched analysis of the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Project (VASQIP) national database (2005-2013).
- Comparison of primary outcome (30- and 90-day mortality) and secondary outcomes (postoperative complications) between AFB and AIP groups.
- Multivariable regression to evaluate the adjusted effect of inflow procedure on mortality.
Main Results:
- A matched cohort of 748 claudicant patients (373 AFB, 375 AIP) was analyzed.
- AFB group experienced longer operative times and higher transfusion rates.
- AFB showed a trend toward higher 30-day mortality and increased rates of pneumonia, DVT/PE, and UTI; however, 90-day mortality rates were similar between groups.
- Multivariable analysis indicated AFB was not independently associated with mortality.
Conclusions:
- Aortofemoral bypass (AFB) is associated with higher early postoperative complications and a trend toward increased mortality compared to alternative inflow procedures (AIPs) for claudication.
- By 90 days postoperatively, both AFB and AIPs exhibit comparable mortality rates in patients with inflow disease.
- Factors such as age, postoperative renal insufficiency, and unplanned reintubation were significant predictors of mortality.
Objective:
Multiple vascular inflow reconstruction options exist for claudication, including aortofemoral bypass (AFB) and alternative inflow procedures (AIPs) such as femoral reconstruction with iliac stents, and femoral-femoral, iliofemoral, and axillofemoral bypass. Contemporary multi-institution comparison of these techniques is lacking.
Methods:
The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Project (VASQIP) national database (2005-2013) was used to compare AFB vs AIP in a propensity-matched analysis. Primary outcome was mortality at 30 and 90 days. Secondary outcomes included rates of postoperative complications. Multivariable regression assessed the adjusted effect of inflow procedure type on mortality.
Results:
A matched cohort of 748 claudicant patients (373 AFB, 375 AIP) was identified. The AFB and AIP groups had similar mean age (59.9 vs 60.8 years; P = .30), gender (P = .51), race (P = .52), recent smoking (79.1% vs 76.5%; P = .43), history of coronary artery disease (14.8% vs 14.7%; P > .99), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (18.8% vs 18.4%; P = .92), renal insufficiency (5.9% vs 6.1%; P > .99), and diabetes (22% vs 20%; P = .53), and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (P = .41). The AFB group had longer mean operative time (4.9 vs 3.5 hours; P < .0001), more senior resident assistants (72.4% vs 61.1%; P < .0001), and greater mean red blood cell transfusion (1.1 vs 0.12 units; P < .0001). AFB and AIP had similar rates of outflow bypass (1.9% vs 1.3%; P = .58) and outflow endovascular interventions (0.54% vs 1.6%; P = .29). AFB trended toward a higher rate of mortality at 30 days postoperatively (2.7% vs 0.8%; P = .06), but by 90 days, the crude mortality rates were similar for the two (2.9% vs 2.1%; P = .5). AFB had higher rates of pneumonia (5.9% vs 0.8%; P < .001), deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (1.3% vs 0%; P = .03), postoperative transfusion (2.7% vs 0.53%; P = .02), and urinary tract infection (3.5% vs 0.8%; P = .01), but similar rates of myocardial infarction (1.6% vs 0.8%; P = .34), stroke (0.8% vs 0%; P = .12), wound complications (13.1% vs 12.8%; P = .91), renal failure (1.1% vs 0.3%; P = .22), graft failure (1.3% vs 1.1%; P = .75), and return to the operating room (12.9% vs 9.6%; P = .17). Multivariable analysis showed AFB was not independently associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1-3.0). Significant factors included age (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4), postoperative renal insufficiency (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.6-4.0), and unplanned reintubation (OR, 35.5; 95% CI, 3.1-399).
Conclusions:
For claudicant patients with inflow disease, AFB has higher rates of 30-day complications and a trend toward higher mortality; however by 90 days postoperatively, the two procedure types have similar rates of mortality.
More Related Videos
06:04Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
09:09A Modified Heterotopic Swine Hind Limb Transplant Model for Translational Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation VCA Research
Published on: October 14, 2013