Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials01:12

Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials

1.8K
Statistical software is pivotal in data analysis and clinical trials by providing tools to analyze data, draw conclusions, and make predictions. These software packages range from simple data management applications to complex analytical platforms, supporting various statistical tests, models, and simulation techniques. Their significance lies in their ability to handle vast amounts of data with precision and efficiency, enabling researchers to validate hypotheses, identify trends, and make...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of alcohol-related disease on hip fracture and mortality: a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries.

American journal of public health·2001
Same author

Determination of county-level prostate carcinoma incidence and detection rates with Medicare claims data.

Cancer·2001
Same author

Geriatric trauma hospitalization in the United States: a population-based study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2001
Same author

Comparison of cesarean section rates in fee-for-service versus managed care patients in the Ohio Medicaid population, 1992-1997.

The American journal of managed care·2001
Same author

Risk of stroke in patients with atrial flutter.

The American journal of cardiology·2001
Same author

Agreement of Medicare claims and tumor registry data for assessment of cancer-related treatment.

Medical care·2001
Same journal

CPX‑351 vs. FLAG‑ida in patients with high-risk AML/MDS and MDS-related gene mutations: a subgroup analysis of the UK NCRI AML19 trial.

Leukemia & lymphoma·2026
Same journal

Specialist palliative care access and end-of-life hospitalizations in acute leukemia: a nationwide register study.

Leukemia & lymphoma·2026
Same journal

D-VRD vs. D-KRD induction in transplant-eligible multiple myeloma: a real-world comparison.

Leukemia & lymphoma·2026
Same journal

T-box factor EOMES is part of an aberrant network in Hodgkin lymphoma.

Leukemia & lymphoma·2026
Same journal

Overall survival of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with venetoclax-obinutuzumab compared to age- and sex-matched general population.

Leukemia & lymphoma·2026
Same journal

Hypertension and time to treatment failure with acalabrutinib and ibrutinib in treatment-naïve CLL/SLL.

Leukemia & lymphoma·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
08:01

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management

Published on: November 30, 2022

5.9K

Sharing Data in Biomedical Research.

A A Rimm1

  • 1a Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

Leukemia & Lymphoma
|July 28, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific investigators should prioritize data sharing for the benefit of all humankind. Overcoming self-interest is crucial for advancing scientific progress and fostering a collaborative research environment.

Keywords:
Databiomedical researchsharing

More Related Videos

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering
09:43

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Published on: November 22, 2019

6.9K
Establishment of a Clinic-based Biorepository
07:50

Establishment of a Clinic-based Biorepository

Published on: May 29, 2017

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
08:01

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management

Published on: November 30, 2022

5.9K
Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering
09:43

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Published on: November 22, 2019

6.9K
Establishment of a Clinic-based Biorepository
07:50

Establishment of a Clinic-based Biorepository

Published on: May 29, 2017

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Ethics
  • Research Methodology
  • Data Management

Background:

  • The scientific community thrives on collaboration and the open exchange of information.
  • Historically, personal or institutional interests have sometimes hindered data sharing.
  • Advancements in science are often accelerated by transparent research practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the challenges and complexities associated with fostering a culture of open data sharing among scientific researchers.
  • To discuss the metaphorical "zero gravity environment" needed for unbiased data dissemination.
  • To encourage scientists to transcend self-interest for collective scientific advancement.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of scientific community dynamics.
  • Discussion of ethical considerations in research data management.
  • Exploration of barriers to open data sharing.

Main Results:

  • Creating a "zero gravity" environment in science requires a significant shift in researcher mindset.
  • Overcoming self-interest is a primary challenge in achieving open data sharing.
  • The benefits of shared data extend beyond individual researchers to the global scientific community.

Conclusions:

  • Promoting data sharing is essential for scientific integrity and progress.
  • A cultural shift towards prioritizing collective good over individual gain is necessary.
  • Addressing the complexities of self-interest is key to unlocking the full potential of collaborative research.