Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

09:02
Immunoglobulin Gene Sequence Analysis In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: From Patient Material To Sequence Interpretation
Published on: November 26, 2018
22.7K
New Agents and Strategies in CLL Treatment
M J Keating1, H Kantarjian1, S O'brien1
1a University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA.
Leukemia & Lymphoma
|July 28, 2016
Summary
Fludarabine Monophosphate (FLU) showed significant anti-leukemic activity in CLL patients. Adding prednisone did not improve response rates or survival, suggesting FLU monotherapy is effective.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is a hematologic malignancy.
- Fludarabine Monophosphate (FLU) is an adenosine analogue with known anti-leukemic properties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of Fludarabine Monophosphate (FLU) alone and in combination with prednisone (P) for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).
- To assess the impact of prednisone addition on response rates, survival, and toxicity in CLL patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of previously treated and untreated CLL patients receiving FLU or FLU + P.
- Response rates (CR, nodular CR, PR), median survival, and toxicity (febrile episodes, thrombocytopenia) were assessed.
- Flow-cytometry and immunoglobulin gene rearrangement studies were used to detect residual disease.
Main Results:
- FLU alone and FLU + P showed similar overall response rates (58% vs 52% in previously treated; 83% vs 82% in previously untreated).
- Median survival was comparable (74 weeks for FLU vs 103 weeks for FLU + P in previously treated).
- No significant advantage was observed with the addition of prednisone; persistent thrombocytopenia was noted in some FLU + P patients.
Conclusions:
- Fludarabine Monophosphate (FLU) demonstrates significant anti-leukemic activity in CLL.
- Addition of prednisone to FLU does not appear to enhance response rates or survival and may increase toxicity.
- Further studies are exploring combination therapies and post-remission strategies like autologous bone marrow transplantation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
6.3K
Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
6.3K
Targeted Cancer Therapies
9.1K
The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
9.1K
Treatment Resistant Cancers
3.9K
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.9K
![Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F62334.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
