Development and Comparison of hERG Blocker Classifiers: Assessment on Different Datasets Yields Markedly Different

Richard L Marchese Robinson1, Robert C Glen1, John B O Mitchell2

  • 1Unilever Centre for Molecular Science Informatics, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, United Kingdom.

Molecular Informatics
|July 29, 2016
PubMed

Insights

Novel computational models predict hERG channel blockers, crucial for identifying cardiotoxic drug candidates. These models offer a competitive alternative to existing methods, improving drug safety assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • hERG channel blockade is linked to cardiotoxicity, necessitating predictive models.
  • Low throughput of functional assays drives the need for computational approaches.
  • Pharmaceutical industry requires models to classify strong (IC50 <1 µM) vs. moderate/weak (IC50 ≥10 µM) hERG inhibitors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present novel binary classification models for prospective hERG inhibitors.
  • To assess the competitiveness of new models against existing literature benchmarks.
  • To highlight critical challenges in building and evaluating predictive computational models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized (discretized) 2D molecular descriptors selected via the Winnow algorithm.
  • Developed classification models using Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs).
  • Compared model performance against established methods (Thai & Ecker, Dubus et al.).

Main Results:

  • Achieved Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) ranging from 0.40 to 0.87 on external test sets.
  • Demonstrated competitive performance compared to existing literature models.
  • Observed significant performance variations when training and testing on different datasets, underscoring data dependency.

Conclusions:

  • Proposed novel computational approaches for predicting hERG inhibition are competitive.
  • Emphasized the importance of rigorous model assessment and awareness of applicability domain limitations.
  • Highlighted data variability as a key challenge in developing robust predictive models for drug safety.

Related Concept Videos

Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of &#946;-Receptor Blockers01:25

Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of β-Receptor Blockers

β-adrenergic antagonists, or β-blockers, modulate the sympathetic nervous system by targeting β-adrenoceptors and inhibiting catecholamine-mediated sympathetic responses. β-blockers differ in their adrenoceptor subtype affinity, lipophilicity, and α-blocking capabilities. The history of β-blocker development began with the prototype, dichloroisoprenaline, which exhibited partial agonist activity. As a result, propranolol was developed as a pure antagonist but...
1.6K
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as &#946;-Adrenergic Blockers01:24

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers

Adrenergic stimulation generally impacts cardiac rate and rhythm. Specifically, stimulation of the β-adrenoceptors triggers an increase in intracellular calcium ion influx and pacemaker currents, which may cause arrhythmias. Catecholamines like adrenaline also demonstrate β2-adrenoceptor-mediated hypokalemia, impacting cardiac action potential and disrupting the normal cardiac rhythm. Class II antiarrhythmic drugs are β-adrenoceptor antagonists or β-blockers, which...
2.2K
Adrenergic Antagonists: &#593; and &#946;-Receptor Blockers01:31

Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers

Third-generation β-blockers, such as labetalol and carvedilol, represent a significant advancement in managing cardiovascular conditions. Unlike conventional β-blockers, which can induce peripheral vasoconstriction, third-generation drugs block α1 adrenoceptors. This promotes vasodilation through several mechanisms, such as increased nitric oxide production, inhibition of calcium ion entry, opening of potassium ion channels, and antioxidant action. Labetalol, for instance, is...
1.4K
Drugs Acting on Autonomic Ganglia: Blockers01:28

Drugs Acting on Autonomic Ganglia: Blockers

Ganglionic blockers inhibit autonomic activity by blocking nicotinic receptors in the autonomic ganglia, suppressing impulse transmission. These blockers lack selectivity between sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia and are ineffective as neuromuscular junction antagonists. They can be categorized into two groups:
1.8K
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of &#593;-Receptor Blockers01:17

Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of ɑ-Receptor Blockers

Adrenergic antagonists, or sympatholytics, inhibit adrenoceptor activation driven by catecholamines or agonists. Based on their adrenoceptor specificity, adrenergic blockers can be categorized into two primary groups: α-adrenergic blockers (α-blockers) and β-adrenergic blockers (β-blockers). α-blockers interact with α1 and α2 subtypes of α-adrenoceptors.
Nonselective α-blockers: Nonselective α-blockers contain haloalkylamine or imidazoline...
1.8K
Antihypertensive Drugs: Types of &#946;-Blockers01:28

Antihypertensive Drugs: Types of β-Blockers

β receptors are classified into three subclasses: β1, β2, and β3. β1 receptors are primarily located in the heart and kidneys. When they get activated, they increase heart rate, contractility, and renin release. This process enhances blood pressure and aids in stress management. In contrast, β2 receptors are situated mainly in the lungs, blood vessels, and skeletal muscles. Upon activation, they trigger smooth muscle relaxation, causing bronchodilation and...
1.9K