Reintroducing differences linguistically!
Abha Khetarpal1, Satendra Singh2
1President and Non-institutional expert, Enabling Unit, Cross the Hurdles, 12/51, Ground Floor, Subhash Nagar, New Delhi-27; University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi 110 095, India,. abha.khetarpal@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Different models have defined the term disability and grouped persons with disabilities accordingly. Time and again, various terms and phrases have been used in different languages to identity persons according to the differences in their bodies and the level of functioning of those bodies. Analogies and metaphors create stereotypes and can affect the formation of an individual's self-concept. Clichés like "divyang", ie one who has some divine powers to compensate for the deficiency in the body, based on the supercrip theory of disability, can distort the self-concept and hamper identity formation. Society and the state cannot and must not shrug off their responsibility by using such sugar-coated terms to label individuals. The real requirement is the creation of a nondisabling environment and the provision of equal opportunities to those with disabilities rather than coining of new terms.
Related Concept Videos
Language and Cognition
Components of Language
Language
Corballis and Suddendorf (2007) and Tomasello and Rakoczy (2003) highlight the role of language in...
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting


