Translocation of Proteins into the Mitochondria
Histone Modification
Overview of Fatty Acid Metabolism
Covalently Linked Protein Regulators
Phase II Reactions: Acetylation Reactions
Mitochondrial Protein Sorting
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Quantification of Site-specific Protein Lysine Acetylation and Succinylation Stoichiometry Using Data-independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry
Published on: April 4, 2018
Fabian Hosp1, Ines Lassowskat2, Valeria Santoro3
1Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max-Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, DE-82152 Martinsried, Germany.
This review explores how lysine acetylation controls mitochondrial function. Mitochondria have unique conditions that favor acetylation, possibly through non-enzymatic processes. The authors use proteomic data to compare acetylation patterns in plants and animals. They find both shared and species-specific modifications. Acetylation affects key metabolic enzymes and may contribute to disease. The review highlights the need for better tools to study acetylation dynamics. It also stresses the importance of cross-species research to understand acetylation's role in health and disease.
Area of Science:
Background:
Cells rely on dynamic signaling to adjust to changing environments. Lysine acetylation is a key modification that influences metabolism and signaling. Mitochondria, with their unique chemical environment, show high levels of acetylation. This may be due to acetyl-CoA compartmentalization and high metabolite concentrations. The elevated pH in mitochondria supports non-enzymatic modifications. These factors suggest mitochondria are hotspots for acetylation. Yet, the full regulatory role of acetylation remains unclear. Prior research has shown acetylation affects enzyme activity and metabolic pathways. This gap motivated a broader investigation into mitochondrial acetylation.
Purpose Of The Study:
This review aims to synthesize current knowledge on mitochondrial lysine acetylation. The goal is to explore its functional impact across species. The authors focus on experimental methods for global acetylation analysis. They also examine differences between plant and animal acetylomes. Evolutionary conservation of acetylation is another key focus. Metabolic effects and disease relevance are also considered. The review highlights technical challenges in the field. It emphasizes the need for cross-species and cross-disease knowledge transfer.
Main Methods:
The authors use a literature review approach to compile findings on mitochondrial acetylation. They analyze global proteomic data from mass spectrometry studies. Comparative analysis covers plant and animal acetylomes. Evolutionary patterns of acetylation are explored using bioinformatics. Metabolic effects are inferred from enzyme activity changes. Disease associations are drawn from clinical and model organism studies. Technical challenges are identified through methodological reviews. The synthesis integrates findings from diverse species and experimental models.
Main Results:
Mitochondrial acetylation is widespread and influenced by acetyl-CoA levels. Non-enzymatic modifications are favored by mitochondrial pH and metabolite concentrations. Mass spectrometry has expanded the known acetylome. Plants and animals show both shared and distinct acetylation patterns. Evolutionary conservation suggests functional importance. Acetylation impacts key metabolic enzymes like succinate dehydrogenase. Disease models show altered acetylation in mitochondrial disorders. Technical hurdles include dynamic range and site-specific analysis limitations.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that acetylation is a major regulatory mechanism in mitochondria. They suggest that acetylation affects metabolic flexibility and disease susceptibility. The review highlights the need for better tools to study acetylation dynamics. Cross-species comparisons reveal conserved and divergent acetylation sites. The authors emphasize the importance of integrating proteomic and functional data. They note that non-enzymatic acetylation may be more prevalent than previously thought. The synthesis points to acetylation as a key node in metabolic control. Future work should focus on linking acetylation to specific physiological outcomes.
The authors propose that acetylation regulates mitochondrial metabolism and signaling. It affects enzyme activity and metabolic flexibility.
Mass spectrometry allows global identification of acetylated proteins. It reveals patterns and site-specific modifications across species.
The elevated pH in mitochondria favors non-enzymatic lysine modifications. This may increase acetylation levels independently of acetyltransferases.
Plants and animals share some acetylation sites but show distinct patterns. These differences may reflect species-specific metabolic adaptations.
Altered acetylation is linked to mitochondrial disorders. This suggests a role in disease progression and metabolic dysfunction.
The authors propose better tools for dynamic acetylation analysis. They emphasize the need for cross-species and cross-disease research.