Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reducing fire hazard during ophthalmic surgery by using compressed air.

G P Neatrour1, I R Lederman

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk.

Ophthalmic Surgery
|June 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intraocular malignant melanoma simulating uveal prolapse.

Annals of ophthalmology·1988
Same author

Fire hazard during ophthalmic surgery.

Ophthalmic surgery·1985
Same author

Primary aspergillosis.

JAMA·1983
Same author

Traumatic chiasmal syndrome associated with pneumocephalus and sellar fracture.

American journal of ophthalmology·1981
Same author

Loss of vision associated with surgical treatment of zygomatic-orbital floor fracture.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1981
Same author

The role of ferroxidase-II and a ferroxidase inhibitor in iron mobilization from tissue stores.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·1980

Using compressed air instead of oxygen during ophthalmic surgery may reduce fire risks. A study found no significant difference in patient oxygen saturation levels between the two gases, suggesting compressed air as a safer alternative.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgical Safety
  • Anesthesiology

Background:

  • Oxygen administration during ophthalmic surgery poses a significant fire hazard.
  • Fire risk is a critical concern in operating rooms, particularly during procedures like cataract surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of using compressed air versus oxygen during ophthalmic surgery.
  • To determine if compressed air can maintain adequate oxygen saturation levels while reducing fire risk.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective clinical study involving 100 patients undergoing cataract surgery under local anesthesia.
  • Patients were randomized to receive either oxygen or compressed air during the procedure.
  • Oxygen saturation levels were monitored throughout the surgery in both groups.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No clinically significant difference in oxygen saturation was observed between the oxygen and compressed air groups.
  • There was no statistically significant difference in the net change of oxygen saturation.
  • A noted difference in overall mean saturation was deemed unreliable due to machine error.

Conclusions:

  • Compressed air is a viable alternative to oxygen for ophthalmic surgery, potentially mitigating fire hazards.
  • Maintaining adequate oxygenation is achievable with compressed air, enhancing patient safety during these procedures.