Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Longitudinal adherence with stool-based testing for colorectal cancer screening in four US health systems.

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association·2026
Same author

Pulling up the ladder: Enduring adversity increases opposition to reform.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Impacts of a Public Health Emergency on Cancer Testing Rates, Follow-up, and Cancer Diagnosis: an Evaluation of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Critical differences among stakeholders in definitions of success following inguinal hernia repair in older adults.

Surgery·2026
Same author

BMI and Initiation of Cancer Screening: A Closer Look at Differences by Race, Ethnicity, and Sex in a Multicenter Population.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same author

Correction: Metabolic syndrome and immune-related adverse events.

Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII·2026
Same journal

Inter and intra-observer agreement for the LST Classification in Large (>2cm) Colorectal Laterally Spreading Tumours.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

The Safety and Effectiveness of Early Anti-Tumor-Necrosis-Factor Therapy for Penetrating Crohn's Disease Complications in Children.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

Calendar of Courses, Symposiums and Conferences.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

Continuing Medical Education Questions: September 2024.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

Continuing Medical Education Questions: September 2024.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

Continuing Medical Education Questions: September 2024.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

9.3K

Financial Incentives for Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial.

Samir Gupta1,2, Stacie Miller3, Mark Koch3

  • 1San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
|August 3, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Offering financial incentives like $5 or $10 does not increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening completion rates. This study found no significant impact of these nudges on screening uptake in a vulnerable population.

More Related Videos

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

990
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

844

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

9.3K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

990
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

844

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Preventive Medicine
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Financial incentives are proposed to increase cancer screening participation, especially in underserved groups.
  • Effectiveness of financial incentives for cancer screening uptake remains unestablished.
  • Vulnerable populations often exhibit lower cancer screening rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if small financial incentives improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening completion.
  • To assess the impact of $5 and $10 incentives on CRC screening in a low-income, uninsured population.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized comparative effectiveness trial was conducted.
  • Participants (aged 50-64) received mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach, with or without a $5 or $10 incentive.
  • Outreach included reminder calls and navigation for abnormal FIT results; primary outcome was FIT completion within one year.

Main Results:

  • FIT completion rates were similar across groups: 36.9% (no incentive), 39.2% ($5 incentive), and 34.6% ($10 incentive).
  • No statistically significant differences were observed between incentive groups and the no-incentive group.
  • Results remained consistent across demographic subgroups and did not affect time to FIT return.

Conclusions:

  • Offering $5 or $10 financial incentives does not significantly impact colorectal cancer screening completion.
  • Financial incentives, at these amounts, are ineffective in promoting CRC screening uptake in this population.
  • Further research may be needed to explore alternative strategies for enhancing screening completion.