Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Torts III

Torts III

Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.

Torts I

Torts I

Torts in nursing are wrongful acts that can harm patients and potentially lead to civil liability for the involved nurse. These wrongful acts range from unintentional errors to deliberate actions. Depending on the nature and severity of the tort, a nurse found liable may face financial penalties or disciplinary actions. Understanding the distinctions between intentional, quasi-intentional, and unintentional torts is crucial for nurses to mitigate risks and provide safe patient care.
Intentional...

Vaccinations

Vaccinations

Torts II

Torts II

Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II

Establishing a secure, collaborative nurse-patient relationship is crucial for delivering high-quality care. This relationship, founded on trust, respect, and honesty, enhances the patient's comfort and willingness to share vital health information. For example, a nurse who listens actively and without judgment provides clear information about health conditions and treatment options and respects patient decisions, which builds a trusting relationship.
Communication between nurses and...

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III

Nurse-to-nurse relationships are legally required to adhere to professional standards, ensuring a respectful and positive working environment. Professional conduct demands that nurses treat all colleagues respectfully and courteously, fostering a productive, supportive workplace. Nurses must actively eliminate bullying, discrimination, and harassment to maintain a safe and inclusive environment.
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Project for interventional Oncology LArge-database in liveR Hepatocellular carcinoma - Preliminary CT-based radiomic analysis (POLAR Liver 1.1).

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2022

Same author

Effects of aging on proteasomal-ubiquitin system, oxidative stress balance and calcium homeostasis in middle-aged female rat colon.

Physiology international·2021

Same author

Physical fatigability and muscle pain in patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis.

Journal of neurology·2021

Same author

Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Radiology: A Literature Review and Future Perspectives.

Journal of oncology·2019

Same author

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation using internally cooled wet electrodes for the treatment of patients with lung tumors.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2019

Same author

Effects of aerobic workout on the changes in the characteristics of dynamics of the center of gravity in different age categories.

Physiology international·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice

Published on: February 22, 2019

[Postvaccinal complication and medical malpractice law].

A Posa, S Zierz

Versicherungsmedizin

|August 4, 2016

Summary

Vaccinations can cause neurological issues like muscular atrophy, even when administered correctly. A legal case found no medical malpractice, highlighting potential vaccine side effects.

Area of Science:

Neurology
Immunology
Medical Law

Background:

Vaccinations are crucial for public health.
Neurological complications following vaccination are rare but documented.
Assessing causality between vaccination and neurological deficits can be complex.

Observation:

A 38-year-old female presented with right upper limb muscular atrophy, paresis, and sensory deficits.
These neurological deficits occurred after receiving multiple vaccinations.
A subsequent legal dispute questioned whether medical malpractice caused the patient's condition.

Findings:

Medical malpractice could not be confirmed as the cause of the neurological deficits.
The case highlights that even correctly administered vaccinations carry a risk of neurological impairment.

More Related Videos

Intralymphatic Immunotherapy and Vaccination in Mice

Intralymphatic Immunotherapy and Vaccination in Mice

Published on: February 2, 2014

A Simple and Efficient Approach to Construct Mutant Vaccinia Virus Vectors

A Simple and Efficient Approach to Construct Mutant Vaccinia Virus Vectors

Published on: October 30, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice

Published on: February 22, 2019

Intralymphatic Immunotherapy and Vaccination in Mice

Intralymphatic Immunotherapy and Vaccination in Mice

Published on: February 2, 2014

A Simple and Efficient Approach to Construct Mutant Vaccinia Virus Vectors

A Simple and Efficient Approach to Construct Mutant Vaccinia Virus Vectors

Published on: October 30, 2016

Establishing a definitive causal link between vaccination and neurological outcomes requires thorough investigation.

Implications:

This case underscores the importance of informed consent and patient counseling regarding potential vaccine side effects.
It emphasizes the need for continued research into rare adverse events following immunization.
Legal and medical professionals must carefully evaluate vaccination-related neurological complaints, distinguishing between malpractice and inherent risks.