Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Art's hidden topology: A window into human perception.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Where do I go from here?: Contribution of idiothetic and allothetic representations to directional decisions when switching environments.

Vision research·2026
Same author

Differential Effects of Lateralization-Task and Training on Low-Frequency EEG Oscillations in Upper- and Lower-Limb Amputees.

Psychological reports·2026
Same author

The flow experience: Polish adaptation and validation of the psychological flow scale (PFS).

PloS one·2025
Same author

Motor imagery in individuals with congenital aphantasia.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Publisher Correction: fNIRS reproducibility varies with data quality, analysis pipelines, and researcher experience.

Communications biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

6.5K

ERPs in an oddball task under vection-inducing visual stimulation.

Paweł Stróżak1, Piotr Francuz2, Paweł Augustynowicz3

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950, Lublin, Poland. p.strozak@gmail.com.

Experimental Brain Research
|August 5, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Moving visual stimuli, particularly in both central and peripheral fields, intensify the vection illusion. This disruption impacts brain responses and slows reaction times during simultaneous visual tasks.

Keywords:
ERPsN2P1P3Vection illusion

More Related Videos

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
10:09

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Published on: September 22, 2014

13.7K
Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

6.5K
Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
10:09

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Published on: September 22, 2014

13.7K
Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • The neural basis of the vection illusion remains unclear.
  • Previous studies examined visually evoked potentials or event-related potentials (ERPs) during vection-inducing stimulation.
  • No prior research investigated the influence of vection-inducing stimulation on brain activity during concurrent visual task performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of stationary and moving visual fields on electrophysiological responses during a visual task.
  • To determine how combined central and peripheral visual motion influences brain activity and reaction times.
  • To elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying the vection illusion in relation to attentional processing.

Main Methods:

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 19 subjects performing a visual discrimination oddball task.
  • Stimuli (O or X) were presented against backgrounds of stationary or horizontally moving black and white vertical stripes in central and peripheral visual fields.
  • Three conditions were tested: (1) stationary center/periphery, (2) moving center/periphery, (3) stationary center/moving periphery.

Main Results:

  • Mean reaction times to targets were slowest when both central and peripheral visual fields were moving.
  • The amplitudes of P1 and N2 (occipital) and P3 (frontal, central, parietal) were attenuated under the moving center/periphery condition.
  • P3 peak latency was prolonged when both central and peripheral visual fields were moving, indicating disrupted processing.

Conclusions:

  • Integration of moving central and peripheral visual fields enhances the vection illusion.
  • This enhanced vection illusion slows reaction times in an oddball task and disrupts electrophysiological responses.
  • Findings suggest that visual motion in both central and peripheral fields significantly impacts visual attention and task performance.