Validity of bone conduction stimulated ABR, MLR and otoacoustic emissions

The present study considers the validity of objective auditory investigation via bone conduction. Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) and Middle Latency Responses (MLR) were recorded in response to a bone vibrator stimulation with or without continuous bilateral air white noise masking. In all cases, such masking was found to result in an absence of recorded evoked potentials. It shows that under bone-conducted stimulation the evoked potential recorded is purely auditory, with no additional mechanical somatosensory component. In a further study, the feasibility of oto-acoustic emissions (OAEs) via bone conduction is demonstrated. These OAEs are, for a given subject, comparable to those found for air-transmission stimulation.