Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Discontinuation and Nonpublication of Randomized Clinical Trials Conducted in Children
Natalie Pica1, Florence Bourgeois2
1Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Boston Combined Residency Program, Boston Children's Hospital and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; and.
Insights
Pediatric randomized clinical trials (RCTs) frequently face discontinuation and nonpublication, impacting research integrity. Funding sources, whether industry or academic, significantly influence these outcomes, affecting the availability of crucial findings for children.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Pediatric Research
- Medical Evidence
Background:
- Trial discontinuation and nonpublication pose risks to research resources and medical evidence.
- Pediatric trials are particularly susceptible due to inherent challenges in pediatric research.
- Understanding the prevalence of these issues in pediatric randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of discontinuation in pediatric RCTs.
- To ascertain the rate of nonpublication for completed pediatric RCTs.
- To identify factors influencing discontinuation and nonpublication, including funding source.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, cross-sectional study design was employed.
- Pediatric RCTs registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between 2008 and 2010 were analyzed.
- Data were extracted from the registry and publication records.
Main Results:
- 19% of pediatric RCTs were discontinued early, with patient accrual difficulties being the primary reason.
- 30% of completed pediatric RCTs remained unpublished, affecting over 69,000 participants.
- Industry-funded trials showed higher rates of discontinuation and nonpublication compared to academic-funded trials.
Conclusions:
- Discontinuation and nonpublication are significant issues in pediatric RCTs, potentially wasting research efforts.
- Funding source is a key determinant, with both academic and industry sponsors contributing to inefficiencies.
- Addressing these outcomes is vital for improving the quality and completeness of pediatric medical evidence.
Background:
Trial discontinuation and nonpublication represent potential waste in research resources and lead to compromises in medical evidence. Pediatric trials may be particularly vulnerable to these outcomes given the challenges encountered in conducting trials in children. We aimed to determine the prevalence of discontinuation and nonpublication of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) conducted in pediatric populations.
Methods:
Retrospective, cross-sectional study of pediatric RCTs registered in ClinicalTrials.gov from 2008 to 2010. Data were collected from the registry and associated publications identified (final search on September 1, 2015).
Results:
Of 559 trials, 104 (19%) were discontinued early, accounting for an estimated 8369 pediatric participants. Difficulty with patient accrual (37%) was the most commonly cited reason for discontinuation. Trials were less likely to be discontinued if they were funded by industry compared with academic institutions (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.77). Of the 455 completed trials, 136 (30%) were not published, representing 69 165 pediatric participants. Forty-two unpublished trials posted results on ClinicalTrials.gov. Trials funded by industry were more than twice as likely to result in nonpublication at 24 and 36 months (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.35-3.64; OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.6-6.08, respectively) and had a longer mean time to publication compared with trials sponsored by academia (33 vs 24 months, P < .001).
Conclusions:
In this sample of pediatric RCTs, discontinuation and nonpublication were common, with thousands of children exposed to interventions that did not lead to informative or published findings. Trial funding source was an important determinant of these outcomes, with both academic and industry sponsors contributing to inefficiencies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Blinding
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism

