Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
Published on: August 17, 2015
A new and consistent parameter for measuring the quality of multivariate analytical methods: Generalized analytical
Wallace Fragoso1, Franco Allegrini2, Alejandro C Olivieri2
1Departamento de Química Analítica, Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Instituto de Química de Rosario (IQUIR-CONICET), Suipacha 531, Rosario S2002LRK, Argentina; Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza, Departamento de Química, Castelo Branco, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
A new metric, generalized analytical sensitivity (γ), is introduced for multivariate calibration. This metric accounts for noise properties, improving prediction error assessment and resolving literature inconsistencies in analytical method comparisons.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Chemometrics
- Spectroscopy
Background:
- Classical sensitivity in multivariate calibration does not fully account for noise, leading to inconsistencies in performance evaluation.
- Existing figures of merit often fail to capture the impact of diverse noise structures on prediction accuracy.
- There is a need for a robust metric that integrates noise characteristics for reliable comparison of calibration models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and define Generalized Analytical Sensitivity (γ) as a novel figure of merit for multivariate calibration.
- To demonstrate the utility of γ in comparing different calibration methodologies and resolving literature discrepancies.
- To establish the correlation between the inverse of γ and prediction errors under various noise conditions.
Main Methods:
- Development of Generalized Analytical Sensitivity (γ) incorporating noise properties.
- Application of γ to simulated and experimental first-order multivariate calibration data.
- Evaluation using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Principal Component Regression (PCR), and Maximum Likelihood PCR (MLPCR) models.
Main Results:
- Generalized Analytical Sensitivity (γ) effectively estimates performance by including noise characteristics.
- The inverse of γ shows a strong correlation with Root Mean Square Errors of Prediction (RMSEP) across different noise types.
- γ provides a consistent basis for comparing calibration methodologies, addressing inconsistencies found in previous studies.
Conclusions:
- Generalized Analytical Sensitivity (γ) is a superior figure of merit for multivariate calibration compared to classical sensitivity.
- γ offers a reliable method for assessing analytical methods, especially in the presence of complex noise structures.
- The proposed metric facilitates more accurate and consistent evaluation of calibration models in analytical chemistry.
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Development of Analytical Methods
Mass Analyzers: Overview
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Quality Assurance

