Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does acceptance of driver monitoring systems differ across countries? A latent profile analysis approach.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

Using psychophysiological metrics for understanding drivers' mental workload and visual attention when overtaking automated truck platoons.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

Crossing in the dark: Investigating the effect of vehicle kinematics and eHMI on older pedestrians' crossing behavior in a virtual reality experiment.

Journal of safety research·2026
Same author

The impact of N-back-induced mental workload and time budget on takeover performance.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2025
Same author

Assessing data imbalance correction methods and gaze entropy for collision prediction.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Modelling cognitive load using drift-diffusion models in pedestrian street-crossing: a method supported by neural evidence.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 16, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.5K

Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.

Georgios K Kountouriotis1, Panagiotis Spyridakos2, Oliver M J Carsten2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M15 6GX, UK.

Accident; Analysis and Prevention
|August 7, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Driver distraction significantly impacts road safety. This study reveals cognitive distraction improves lane keeping, while visual distraction

Keywords:
Cognitive loadDriver distractionDrivingSecondary tasksSteering

More Related Videos

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

5.1K
Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
11:12

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

17.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 16, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.5K
Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

5.1K
Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
11:12

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

17.9K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Automotive Safety
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Driver distraction is a major cause of road accidents.
  • The specific effects of different distraction types on driving performance are not fully understood.
  • Understanding these effects is crucial for developing effective safety measures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of visual and non-visual distractions on driving performance.
  • To differentiate the effects of central vs. offset visual distractions.
  • To analyze steering control metrics under various distraction scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a high-fidelity driving simulator to replicate real-world driving conditions.
  • Introduced distinct visual tasks (central, offset, lead vehicle) and non-visual (cognitive) tasks.
  • Measured driving performance metrics including lane deviation, lane keeping, and steering control parameters (reversals, acceleration, entropy).

Main Results:

  • Non-visual (cognitive) distraction improved lane keeping and gaze concentration but increased steering wheel reversal rates, acceleration, and entropy.
  • Central visual distraction reduced lane deviation, similar to cognitive distraction, but increased overall steering activity.
  • Offset visual distraction with gaze diversion led to lane keeping performance similar to baseline, with steering wheel reversal rates effectively distinguishing between distraction types.

Conclusions:

  • Different types of driver distraction have distinct effects on steering control and lane keeping.
  • Steering wheel reversal rates can serve as a sensitive indicator to differentiate between non-visual and visual distractions.
  • Findings provide insights into the mechanisms of steering control under various in-vehicle distractions, informing the design of safer automotive systems.