Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited
Published on: February 16, 2022
Follow-up care after grommet insertion in children: Review article
Zahir Mughal1, Vijay Thirunavukarasu1, Adnan Darr2
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Russells Hall Hospital, Pensnett Rd, Dudley, DY1 2HQ, UK.
Insights
Follow-up care after pediatric grommet insertion often includes unnecessary appointments. Shifting reviews to general practitioners or nurses could reduce otolaryngology clinic workload.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Pediatric Healthcare Management
Background:
- Grommet insertion is a frequent pediatric surgical procedure.
- Extended otolaryngology follow-up negatively impacts clinic efficiency and hospital finances.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current research and expert opinions on pediatric follow-up care post-grommet insertion.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science) from January 1990 to September 2015.
Main Results:
- Follow-up protocols vary significantly, with many post-grommet insertion appointments being potentially unnecessary (up to 75% with normal findings).
- Alternative providers like General Practitioners (GPs), audiologists, or specialist nurses are suggested for routine reviews.
Conclusions:
- Current follow-up schedules are often based on consensus rather than strict evidence.
- Streamlining care by discharging patients earlier to less resource-intensive settings can alleviate outpatient burdens.
Background:
Grommet insertion is a common procedure in children. A lengthy otolaryngology follow-up can have an adverse impact on clinic waiting times, new patient appointment availability, and pecuniary disadvantage for the hospital.
Objective Of Review:
To consolidate research and opinion concerning follow-up care following grommet insertion in a pediatric population.
Search Strategy:
The literature between January 1990 and September 2015 was searched on MEDLINE (Ovid), Google Scholar, PubMed and Web of Science databases.
Results:
Guidelines and consensus of opinion from the United States advocate that an initial post-operative review should take place within 4 weeks, and subsequent appointments every 6 months until grommet extrusion. Recent audit reports from the United Kingdom have shown that some groups arrange their first post-operative review at 3 months, and subsequent appointments vary considerably from no further follow-up to up to 24 months. Up to 75% of follow-up appointments were scheduled despite normal audiometry and clinical findings after grommet insertion, suggesting a large cohort of patients may undergo unnecessary specialist clinic reviews. General practioners (GP), audiologists or specialist nurses are potential alternative providers of regular reviews to ensure normal hearing thresholds and an adequate tympanic membrane healing course.
Conclusion:
Follow-up schedules are largely driven by consensus of opinion. A significant number of follow-up appointments in otolaryngology clinic appear to be redundant. Recently attention has been drawn to earlier discharge from otolaryngology clinic with subsequent follow-up in less resource and cost intensive clinics coordinated by GPs, audiologist or nurses, which may help alleviate some outpatient workload on acute hospital trusts.
Related Concept Videos
Tracheostomy Care I: Pre-procedural Steps
Required Equipment
The equipment necessary for tracheostomy care includes:
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
Tracheostomy Care II: Procedure
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene, and put on personal protective equipment: gown, gloves, mask and...

