Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation
Published on: June 26, 2018
Sacral Nerve Stimulation Fails to Offer Long-term Benefit in Patients With Slow-Transit Constipation
Vicki Patton1, Peter Stewart, David Z Lubowski
11 St. George Hospital Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2 Department of Colorectal Surgery, St. George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 3 Department of Surgery, Concord Repatriate Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 4 Department of Gastroenterology, St. George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 5 Department of Gastroenterology and Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Sacral nerve stimulation did not show long-term benefits for slow-transit constipation. Most patients experienced treatment failure or adverse events, indicating it is not an effective therapy.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Colorectal Surgery
- Neuromodulation
Background:
- Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is explored for treating slow-transit constipation (STC).
- A prior randomized controlled trial (RCT) found no significant therapeutic benefit of SNS over sham stimulation in STC patients.
- Long-term outcomes of these patients following the initial RCT warrant further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) in patients diagnosed with scintigraphically confirmed slow-transit constipation (STC).
Main Methods:
- This study involved long-term follow-up of patients previously enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
- The study was conducted at an academic tertiary public hospital.
- Primary outcome was complete evacuation frequency; secondary outcome was colonic transit time at 1 year.
Main Results:
- Fifty-three patients entered long-term follow-up; 44 withdrew due to treatment failure or adverse events.
- At 1 and 2 years, only 18.8% and 5.7% of patients, respectively, met the primary outcome of improved evacuation.
- Colonic transit time did not significantly improve at 1-year follow-up compared to baseline.
Conclusions:
- Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) demonstrated no long-term therapeutic benefit for patients with slow-transit constipation (STC).
- High rates of treatment failure and adverse events suggest SNS is not an effective treatment for this condition.
- Further research may explore alternative therapeutic strategies for STC.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Serotonin Receptor Agonists
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Bulk-Forming and Stimulant Laxatives
Bulk-forming laxatives, such as psyllium, methylcellulose, and polycarbophil, absorb water in the intestine, increasing stool bulk and promoting bowel movement. This...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Other Laxatives
Osmotic or saline laxatives, like magnesium hydroxide or milk of...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists

