Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prehospital Management of Suspected Spinal Cord Injuries: Perspectives from the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma.

Prehospital emergency care·2026
Same author

National study to characterize teletrauma use in United States emergency departments.

Journal of telemedicine and telecare·2026
Same author

Readiness Requires Repetition: Why Daily Trauma Care Is the Foundation of Military Surge Capacity.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same author

Essential considerations in the use of improvised tourniquet: An editorial on "An American College of Surgeons Committee on trauma stop the bleed guideline on the use of improvised tourniquets for trauma patients with life-threatening extremity hemorrhage 2025".

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery·2026
Same author

The Current State of Acute Care Surgery Workforce and Practice Models: A Joint Statement by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, and the Western Trauma Association.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same author

The current state of acute care surgery workforce and practice models: A joint statement by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, and the Western Trauma Association.

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
06:48

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

10.4K

Live tissue versus simulation training for emergency procedures: Is simulation ready to replace live tissue?

Stephen L Barnes1, Alex Bukoski2, Jeffrey D Kerby3

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.

Surgery
|August 11, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Live tissue and simulation training both improve emergency procedure skills. No single method is superior, suggesting combined training is most effective for healthcare professionals.

More Related Videos

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

4.2K
Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing
11:45

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing

Published on: August 17, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
06:48

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

10.4K
Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

4.2K
Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing
11:45

Creation of a High-Fidelity, Low-Cost, Intraosseous Line Placement Task Trainer via 3D Printing

Published on: August 17, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Surgical Simulation
  • Emergency Medicine Training

Background:

  • Training for critical emergency procedures presents significant challenges in consistent application across healthcare settings.
  • A debate exists regarding the efficacy of simulation versus live tissue training, with legislative proposals to ban live tissue training in the Department of Defense.
  • Limited objective evidence currently informs best practices for emergency procedure training methodologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare live tissue training and simulation-based training for 12 life-saving emergency procedures.
  • To assess the impact of training modality on self-efficacy, cognitive knowledge, psychomotor performance, and affective response.
  • To gather expert opinions on the value and limitations of both training approaches.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized study involving 742 subjects comparing live tissue and simulation training.
  • Pre- and post-training assessments included self-efficacy, cognitive knowledge, and psychomotor performance.
  • Electrodermal activity measured affective response, complemented by subject matter expert gap analysis.

Main Results:

  • Both training modalities yielded significant pre- to post-training improvements across all measured domains (P < .01).
  • No statistically significant differences in overall performance between live tissue and simulation were found, except for fluid resuscitation.
  • Simulation showed an advantage in 7 procedures for the lowest pretest performance subgroup, while live tissue training elicited a greater affective response (P < .01).

Conclusions:

  • Neither simulation nor live tissue training alone is definitively superior; combined approaches offer added value.
  • The wholesale abandonment of live tissue training is not supported by current evidence.
  • Continued integration of both live tissue and simulation-based training is recommended for optimal emergency procedure preparedness.