Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Numeric simulation of occlusal interferences in molars restored with ultrathin occlusal veneers
Pascal Magne1, Raymond Cheung2
1The Don and Sybil Harrington Professor of Esthetic Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
Statement Of Problem:
Selecting material for a minimally invasive occlusal veneer reconstruction concept requires an understanding of how stresses are distributed during functional and parafunctional forces.
Purpose:
The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate stress distribution in a maxillary molar restored with ultrathin occlusal veneers and subjected by an antagonistic mandibular molar to clenching and working and nonworking movements.
Material And Methods:
A maxillary first molar was modeled from microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) data, using medical image processing software, stereolithography editing/optimizing software, and finite element software. Simulated ultrathin occlusal veneer materials were used. The mandibular molar antagonist was a solid nondeformable geometric entity. Loads simulated clenching, working, and nonworking movements with loading of 500 N. The values of the maximum principal stress were recorded.
Results:
In the clenching load situation, maximum tensile stresses were located at the occlusal veneer (52 MPa for composite resin versus 47 MPa for ceramic). In the working movement, significant additional tensile stresses were found on the palatal root (87 MPa for composite resin and 85 MPa for ceramic). In the nonworking movement, tensile stress on the ultrathin occlusal veneer increased to 118 MPa for composite resin and 143 MPa for ceramic veneers. Tensile stress peaks shifted to the mesiobuccal root (75 MPa for composite resin and 74 MPa for ceramic).
Conclusions:
The topography of stresses generated by the various occlusal interferences were clearly identified. Significant tensile stress concentrations were found within the restoration's occlusal topography and root, with the nonworking interference being the most harmful and also the most revealing of the difference between the composite resin and ceramic ultrathin occlusal veneers.
