Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Developing techniques for cause-responsibility analysis of occupational accidents.
Mousa Jabbari1, Roghayeh Ghorbani2
1Industrial Safety Department, School of Health, Safety and Environment, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
This study developed cause-responsibility analysis (CRA) techniques to identify factors contributing to occupational accidents. Findings reveal construction project management holds significant responsibility for work-related accidents, offering insights for prevention.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Safety and Health
- Risk Management
- Construction Management
Background:
- Work-related accidents pose significant risks in the construction industry.
- Determining the root causes and responsible parties is crucial for effective accident prevention.
- Existing methods may not adequately detail responsibilities and their rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To specify the causes of occupational accidents.
- To determine social responsibility and the role of involved groups in work-related accidents.
- To develop and test novel cause-responsibility analysis (CRA) techniques.
Main Methods:
- Development of occupational accidents causes tree and responsibility tree.
- Creation of an occupational accidents component-responsibility analysis worksheet.
- Application of developed cause-responsibility analysis (CRA) techniques, including occupational accidents tree analysis (OATA) and occupational accidents components analysis (OACA).
- Analysis of 100 fatal/disabling occupational accidents in Tehran's construction sector (2010-2014).
Main Results:
- The management group in construction projects bears a substantial 74.65% responsibility for work-related accidents.
- The developed OATA and OACA techniques effectively determine responsible groups and their rates of responsibility.
- The study identified specific tasks, responsibilities, and their associated rates contributing to accidents.
Conclusions:
- The developed CRA techniques are effective tools for occupational accident investigation and analysis.
- Pinpointing management's high responsibility rate provides a clear focus for accident prevention strategies.
- Implementing these techniques can lead to targeted interventions and reduced work-related accidents.
Related Concept Videos
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Cause and Effect
Causality in Epidemiology
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
The Availability Heuristic

