Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guidelines for evaluating decubitus ulcer research.

R S Abruzzese

    Decubitus
    |February 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Critically evaluating research on pressure ulcer products requires controlling variables like patient nutrition and the Hawthorne Effect. Replicating studies ensures reliable product adoption for effective pressure ulcer prevention and treatment.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Differentiation and the least common denominator.

    Journal of continuing education in nursing·2014
    Same author

    Historical perspectives and future implications.

    Journal of continuing education in nursing·2014
    Same author

    Cooperation/Collaboration.

    Journal of continuing education in nursing·2014
    Same author

    Promotion and tenure.

    Journal of continuing education in nursing·2014
    Same author

    The scope of continuing nursing education as a field of practice.

    Journal of continuing education in nursing·2014
    Same author

    Selected readings.

    Journal of continuing education in nursing·2014
    Same journal

    Skin failure and the pressure ulcer.

    Decubitus·1993
    Same journal

    A comparison of Epi-Lock and saline dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers.

    Decubitus·1993
    Same journal

    Specialty support surfaces: a cost containment perspective.

    Decubitus·1993
    Same journal

    Comparison of quantitative methodologies to define chronic pressure ulcer measurements.

    Decubitus·1993
    Same journal

    The effects of prolonged pressure on skin blood flow in elderly patients at risk for pressure ulcers.

    Decubitus·1993
    Same journal

    Questions about staging.

    Decubitus·1993
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Clinical Research Methodology
    • Wound Care Science

    Background:

    • Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment rely on effective products and devices.
    • Evaluating the scientific rigor of research supporting these products is crucial for clinical practice.
    • Existing literature may lack sufficient control over variables impacting study outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To systematically evaluate research components and company literature for pressure ulcer products.
    • To highlight critical variables that need control in research design.
    • To advocate for evidence-based adoption of medical devices.

    Main Methods:

    • Application of classic research critique principles.
    • Systematic review of research reports and industry-published literature.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification and analysis of key confounding variables in pressure ulcer research.

    • Main Results:

    • Research reports and literature often fail to adequately control critical variables.
    • Key variables influencing findings include pressure relief, nutrition, hydration, subject comparability, and psychological effects (Hawthorne, Pygmalion).
    • Inconsistent research methodologies hinder reliable product evaluation.

    Conclusions:

    • Rigorous control of variables is essential for valid pressure ulcer product research.
    • Replication of research findings is necessary before adopting products into clinical protocols.
    • Improved research standards are needed for evidence-based wound care device selection.