Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Preventive Healthcare Services

Preventive Healthcare Services

Preventive healthcare services keep people healthy via frequent check-ups, screening, and counseling. They primarily aid in disease prevention rather than treating an acute or chronic illness. Preventive treatment also keeps individuals productive and energetic, allowing them to work well into their retirement years. Examples of preventive care services include:

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...

Integrated Healthcare System

Integrated Healthcare System

An integrated healthcare system (IHS) is a set of organizations that provides for or arranges to provide coordinated and continuous service to a defined population. The IHS takes responsibility for that particular population's health status and outcome, both clinically and fiscally. An integrated healthcare system is a well-organized, well-coordinated, and collaborative network. The integrated delivery system is a network that connects different healthcare providers to deliver organized,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Effect of Disturbance Frequency on Cyclic Hardening Behavior and Energy Dissipation of Coal under Cyclic Loads.

ACS omega·2026

Same author

Quantitative limits of host-driven HIV transcription and host gene control by the viral transactivator Tat.

Nucleic acids research·2026

Same author

Risk of developing subsequent primary breast cancer among non-breast cancer survivors: a retrospective cohort study.

Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)·2026

Same author

Brief Report: Impact of PLCOm2012 Ethnicity Model Variations on Eligibility for the Alberta Lung Cancer Screening Program.

JTO clinical and research reports·2026

Same author

A machine learning-derived speech index as a biomarker for Huntington's disease severity.

Journal of neurology·2026

Same author

Rational design and sequence optimization of an mRNA-LNP vaccine elicits protective immunity against infectious bronchitis virus in chickens.

Vaccine·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

Integrated Cancer Screening Performance Indicators: A Systematic Review.

Silvina C Mema¹, Huiming Yang², Marcus Vaska²

¹Interior Health Authority, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.

|August 13, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Integrated cancer screening adherence for women over 50 is rarely reported. Adherence to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings combined ranged from 8% to 43%, highlighting a need for better monitoring.

More Related Videos

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

A Comprehensive Procedure to Evaluate the In Vivo Performance of Cancer Nanomedicines

A Comprehensive Procedure to Evaluate the In Vivo Performance of Cancer Nanomedicines

Published on: March 4, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

A Comprehensive Procedure to Evaluate the In Vivo Performance of Cancer Nanomedicines

A Comprehensive Procedure to Evaluate the In Vivo Performance of Cancer Nanomedicines

Published on: March 4, 2017

Area of Science:

Public Health
Preventive Medicine
Oncology

Background:

Cancer screening guidelines recommend regular screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers in women over 50.
Population-based programs monitor individual cancer screening uptake but rarely report integrated adherence measures across multiple screenings.
Integrated adherence measures are crucial for understanding screening behaviors and identifying barriers.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify indicators of participation in integrated screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers among women over 50.
To assess the current reporting of adherence across these three cancer screenings.

Main Methods:

A systematic literature search was conducted for studies published between 2000 and 2015.
Search terms included synonyms for integrated screening and individual cancer screenings (cervical, breast, colorectal).
Databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, and others, along with grey literature.

Main Results:

Only 7 out of 78 initially retrieved articles reported summary measures of screening adherence across all three cancer types.
Overall adherence to integrated cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening ranged widely from approximately 8% to 43%.
Reports on combined screening adherence for these three cancers are notably infrequent.

Conclusions:

There is a significant gap in reporting integrated adherence measures for multiple cancer screenings in women over 50.
Integrated measures offer valuable insights into population needs and can inform strategies to improve overall screening adherence.
Further research and reporting on integrated cancer screening are essential for enhancing public health initiatives.