Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

564
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
564
Traumatic Memory01:20

Traumatic Memory

667
Emotionally traumatic events often lead to memories that are exceptionally vivid and enduring, sometimes persisting with remarkable clarity throughout an individual's life. A classic example of this phenomenon is a person who survives a car accident. Even years later, they may recall every detail of the event with startling accuracy — the screeching of the tires, the jarring impact, and the acrid smell of burning rubber. Such vividness contrasts sharply with how an individual...
667
Forgetting01:21

Forgetting

480
Forgetting is an intrinsic aspect of human memory, characterized by the gradual loss or inaccessibility of information over time. Hermann Ebbinghaus, a pioneering psychologist, extensively studied this phenomenon and formulated the forgetting curve. This curve illustrates that memory loss occurs rapidly immediately after learning and then decelerates over time. Several mechanisms contribute to forgetting, including encoding failure, storage decay, retrieval failure, and interference.
Encoding...
480
System of Memory01:23

System of Memory

7.7K
Memory is categorized into three major systems: sensory memory, short-term memory (STM), and long-term memory (LTM). These systems differ in their capacity and the duration for which they can hold information. Sensory memory captures raw sensory input from the environment, holding it for just a few seconds or less. For example, on hearing a brief, loud sound, like a car horn honking, the sound seems to linger in the mind for a moment even after it stops. This is an instance of sensory memory...
7.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.7K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.7K
Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory01:22

Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory

697
Improving short-term memory can be achieved through techniques like chunking and rehearsal. Chunking involves organizing information into larger, more manageable units. This technique is particularly useful for information that exceeds the typical memory span of between five and nine items. For instance, logging into an online account with a password like "ta89vq0179gz" involves grouping letters and numbers into three chunks—ta89, vq01, and 79gz. It makes large amounts of...
697

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum: Individuals under voluntary treatment with sexual interest in minors: what risk do they pose?

Frontiers in psychiatry·2025
Same author

Circulating Tumor DNA for Prediction of Complete Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (NEORECT Trial).

Cancers·2025
Same author

Precision imaging of cardiac function and scar size in acute and chronic porcine myocardial infarction using ultrahigh-field MRI.

Communications medicine·2024
Same author

Cardiac function in a large animal model of myocardial infarction at 7 T: deep learning based automatic segmentation increases reproducibility.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Corrigendum: Individuals under voluntary treatment with sexual interest in minors: what risk do they pose?

Frontiers in psychiatry·2024
Same author

Individuals under voluntary treatment with sexual interest in minors: what risk do they pose?

Frontiers in psychiatry·2023
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 16, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.2K

Continuity and discontinuity in memory for threat.

Michael Hock1, Jan H Peters1, Heinz Walter Krohne2

  • 1a Department of Psychology , University of Bamberg , Bamberg , Germany.

Cognition & Emotion
|August 18, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Individuals with avoidant coping styles exhibit poor long-term memory for threat, while vigilant individuals recall threat information better after long delays. Retention interval processes are crucial for memory differences.

Keywords:
Avoidanceanxietymemoryrepressive discontinuityvigilance

More Related Videos

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.8K
Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance
08:17

Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance

Published on: July 19, 2017

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 16, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.2K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.8K
Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance
08:17

Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance

Published on: July 19, 2017

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Individual differences in coping styles (avoidant vs. vigilant) impact threat memory.
  • Understanding memory for aversive information is crucial for psychological well-being.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate memory performance for aversive information in individuals with avoidant and vigilant coping styles.
  • To examine the role of retention interval processes in memory for threat.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments utilized a quasi-continuous tracking paradigm to monitor memory performance over time.
  • Participants with varying coping styles recalled aversive stimuli after different retention intervals.
  • Cognitive load during the retention interval was manipulated in the second experiment.

Main Results:

  • Avoidant individuals showed reduced long-term retrieval of aversive information, particularly after long delays.
  • Vigilant individuals demonstrated enhanced recall of aversive information after long retention intervals when not under cognitive load.
  • Cognitive load during retention significantly affected vigilant individuals' memory for threat.

Conclusions:

  • Coping styles significantly influence memory for aversive information.
  • Processes occurring during the retention interval are critical for understanding individual differences in threat memory.
  • Retention interval attention is as important as encoding, appraisal, and retrieval for memory outcomes.