Experience with the Groshong long-term central venous catheter

A study of the Groshong catheter in a gynecologic oncology population is presented, describing the catheter's ease of insertion, and patient acceptance and compliance in catheter care. From December 1985 through November 1987, 72 Groshong catheters were inserted in 67 patients. The Groshong differs from conventional Hickman-type catheters in design and maintenance. Thirty-two of 72 catheters (44%) were inserted under local anesthesia. The remaining catheters were inserted under general anesthesia at the time of major gynecologic procedures. None of the cases required fluoroscopy. The insertion technique is less traumatic than conventional approaches because of a stainless steel tunneling device. The median duration of use was 191 days. There were no cases of pneumothorax or catheter occlusion. Catheter removal was required in four cases with skin infection unresponsive to local therapy and in two cases with bacteremia. One patient developed thrombosis of the right subclavian vein but was treated without catheter removal. One patient with a skin infection at the exit site accidentally dislodged her catheter. The overall complication rate was 11% (8 of 72 cases).