Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

05:44
Author Spotlight: Creating a Versatile Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Model Relevant for Both Male and Female Mice
Published on: October 13, 2023
2.6K
Gender Representation on Journal Editorial Boards in the Mathematical Sciences
1Dept. of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, Macalester College, Saint Paul, MN, United States of America.
Plos One
|August 19, 2016
Summary
Women hold only 8.9% of editorships across 435 mathematical science journals, significantly underrepresenting their presence in academia. This study highlights disparities in gender representation within scientific publishing.
Area of Science:
- Mathematical Sciences
- Gender Studies
- Bibliometrics
Background:
- Women constitute approximately 15% of U.S. tenure-track faculty in mathematical sciences.
- Existing data on gender distribution in academic publishing, particularly in mathematics, is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify gender representation on editorial boards of mathematical science journals.
- To identify variations in representation across different journals, subfields, publishers, and countries.
- To introduce a novel semi-automated method for gender inference in large-scale studies.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 13,067 editorships across 435 mathematical science journals.
- Development and application of a semi-automated gender inference tool with 97.5% accuracy.
- Comparative analysis against the proportion of women in U.S. mathematical sciences faculty.
Main Results:
- Women hold 8.9% of editorships, below their academic representation.
- Significant variations in gender representation were observed across journals, subfields, publishers, and countries.
- The developed semi-automated method provides a scalable approach for gender distribution studies.
Conclusions:
- Gender disparity exists on editorial boards in mathematical sciences.
- Further research is needed to understand and address these underrepresentations.
- The methodology can be applied to study gender distribution in other academic fields.
Related Concept Videos
Frequency-dependent Selection
24.4K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.4K
Inclusive Fitness
43.4K
Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.
43.4K
Types of Selection
46.1K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
46.1K
Probability Laws
44.8K
Overview
44.8K
Sex-linked Disorders
110.4K
Like autosomes, sex chromosomes contain a variety of genes necessary for normal body function. When a mutation in one of these genes results in biological deficits, the disorder is considered sex-linked.
110.4K
Limits to Natural Selection
35.7K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
35.7K

