Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
A scalable approach to measuring the impact of nonignorable nonresponse with an EMA application
Weihua Gao1, Donald Hedeker2, Robin Mermelstein3
1Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A.
Abstract:
There is often a need to assess the dependence of standard analyses on the strong untestable assumption of ignorable missingness. To tackle this problem, past research developed simple sensitivity index measures assuming a linear impact of nonignorability and missingness in outcomes only. These restrictions limit their applicability for studies with missingness in both outcome and covariates. Nonignorable missingness in this setting poses significant new analytic challenges and calls for more general and flexible methods that are also computationally tractable even for large datasets. In this paper, we relax the restrictions of extant linear sensitivity index methods and develop nonlinear sensitivity indices that maintain computational simplicity and perform equally well when the impact of nonignorability is locally linear. On the other hand, they can substantially improve the effectiveness of local sensitivity analysis when regression outcomes and covariates are subject to concurrent missingness. In this situation, the local linear sensitivity analysis fails to detect the impact of nonignorability while the proposed nonlinear sensitivity measures can. Because the new sensitivity indices avoid fitting complicated nonignorable models, they are computationally tractable (i.e., scalable) for use in large datasets. We develop general formula for nonlinear sensitivity index measures, and evaluate the new measures in simulated data and a real dataset collected using the ecological momentary assessment method. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Margin of Error
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
There are many different types of ELISAs, but they all involve an antibody molecule whose constant region binds an enzyme, leaving the variable region free to bind its specific antigen. Enzyme-substrate reaction allows the antigen to be visualized or...

