Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 17, 2011
CREATING AND AUDITING A NEW ELECTRONIC CONTINUOUS INFUSION PRESCRIPTION CHART FOR A PAEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE UNIT
Emily Siu1, Kalaimaran Sadasivam2, Nanna Christiansen1
1Pharmacy Department, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust.
Insights
An electronic continuous infusion prescription chart significantly reduced pediatric prescription errors, from 30.7% to 0.7%. This tool enhances patient safety in pediatric critical care units by minimizing medication errors.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Health Informatics
- Medication Safety
Background:
- Prescription errors, particularly for continuous infusions, are a significant concern in pediatric care.
- Electronic or web-based calculators show promise in minimizing these errors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and implement an electronic continuous infusion prescription chart in a pediatric critical care unit (PCCU).
- To audit the chart's effectiveness in reducing prescription errors.
Main Methods:
- An electronic chart was developed using Excel, incorporating validated formulas for medication calculations based on age and weight.
- Handwritten prescriptions were audited for 6 months pre-implementation and electronic prescriptions for 6 months post-implementation.
- Audited parameters included dose, infusion rate, concentration, route, legibility, and patient details.
Main Results:
- Handwritten prescriptions had a significantly higher error rate (30.7%) compared to electronic charts (0.7%, p<0.002).
- No errors were detected in electronic prescriptions regarding dose, volume, or rate calculations.
- The single error on electronic charts was due to incorrect data input.
Conclusions:
- The electronic continuous infusion prescription chart effectively and significantly reduced prescription error rates in the PCCU.
- The system offers advantages such as ease of setup, low cost, and adaptability, while improving efficiency of medical and pharmacy resources.
Introduction:
Prescription errors, including continuous infusion prescriptions are one major source of concern in the paediatric population. Evidence suggests that use of an electronic or web-based calculator could minimise these errors. In our paediatric critical care unit (PCCU) we have created an electronic continuous infusion prescription chart to target errors in this area and conducted an audit to assess its effect on error reduction.
Aim:
To create an electronic continuous infusion prescription chart and audit its effect on prescription errors.
Method:
Similar electronic continuous infusion prescription charts were evaluated. A Choice of electronic formats were considered and excel was chosen for its simplicity and flexibility. The choice of medications to be included, dilution method, and dosage range was agreed between PCCU consultant, pharmacy and nursing staff. Formulas for calculating each medication infusion was created and validated for different age and weight ranges by at least 2 PCCU trained pharmacists, accounting for capping at certain age and weight bands as appropriate for the medication. These were programmed into the spreadsheet for automatic calculation using inputted age and weight for the selected medications. Continuous infusion prescriptions were audited 6 months before and after implementation in April 2015 of this electronic chart. Parameters audited include medication dose, infusion rate, concentration, route, legibility, and missing or incorrect patient details. A trial period of 4 weeks preceded implementation.
Results:
The electronic continuous infusion prescription form was created and used on PCCU. Hand written prescriptions had higher error rate (30.7%) as compared to electronic charts (0.7%) with a p-value <0.002. No errors were found in electronic prescriptions in regards to dose, volume and rate calculation.
Discussion And Conclusion:
The use of an electronic continuous infusion prescription chart has been successfully set up and used on PCCU. Its use has significantly reduced continuous infusion prescription error rates. The one error on electronic prescription charts was due to incorrect data input.Whilst similar formats exist for transferring patients between intensive care units in the UK, this differs by its use on inpatients. As a new project, various learning points were gained during the process. Some discrepancies in the formulas were identified during the validation process and trial period and the flexibility to change these quickly was paramount. The need to standardise prescribing habits and administration preferences was also important before proceeding to the formulation stage. Security and version control was another factor to consider ensuring restricted use of the most updated version.Major advantages of this prescription chart include ease of set up and low cost compared to established commercial programs. Another was the ability to quickly adapt information to the changing needs of the unit or updated dosage recommendations.In summary, the use of the electronic continuous infusion prescription chart has significantly reduced prescription error rates on PCCU. It has also allowed more efficient use of medical and pharmacy time resources.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
IV Infusion to Oral Dosing: Conversion Methods
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
One-Compartment Model: IV Infusion
The one-compartment model for IV infusion uses mathematical equations to describe the rate of change in drug quantity in the body. At steady-state or infusion equilibrium, the drug input...

