Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Influence of Birthweight on the Prospective Stillbirth Risk in the Third Trimester: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study
Stephen Contag1, Clayton Brown2, Sarah Crimmins1
1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of birthweight on prospective stillbirth risk.
Methods:
Cross-sectional study of singleton births in the United States from 2010 to 2012 from 32 through 42 weeks was conducted. Stillbirth risk was stratified by birthweight and gestational age adjusted for time from death to delivery. The primary outcome was the prospective stillbirth risk for each birthweight category. Student t-test was used for continuous data, chi-square to compare categorical data. Binomial proportions were used to derive prospective and cumulative risks. Cox proportional hazards regression with log-rank test comparison for heterogeneity was used to compare birthweight categories and derive hazard ratios.
Results:
There was an increase in the risk for stillbirth as birthweight diverged from the reference group. At 40 weeks adjusted gestational age, stillbirth rate per 10,000 births for the bottom (6.17, 95% CI: 7.47-4.87) and top (2.37, 95%CI: 3.1-1.65) 5th centiles of birthweight conveyed the highest risk. Hazard ratios (HR) after adjusting for covariates were: 1.55 (1.73-1.4) <5th centile and 2.2 (2.43-1.99) > 95th centile (p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Stillbirth risk increases as birthweight departs from the mean. Birthweight below the 5th and above the 95th centile conveyed a significantly increased risk for stillbirth which was most noticeable after 37 weeks.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Teratogenicity
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management
Probability Laws
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

