Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
Published on: January 7, 2019
Spatial Variation in the Quality of American Community Survey Estimates
David C Folch1, Daniel Arribas-Bel2, Julia Koschinsky3
1Department of Geography, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA. dfolch@fsu.edu.
Data quality from the American Community Survey (ACS) varies geographically, with higher uncertainty in southern US, suburban, and lower-income areas. This impacts the reliability of social science research and resource allocation decisions.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Geographic Information Systems
- Statistical Analysis
Background:
- The American Community Survey (ACS) is a critical data source for social science research, public policy, and federal resource allocation.
- High uncertainty in frequently used ACS estimates can compromise the reliability of research findings and decision-making.
- Understanding spatial and non-spatial patterns of ACS estimate uncertainty is crucial for accurate data interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore spatial and non-spatial patterns in the quality of American Community Survey (ACS) estimates.
- To identify demographic, economic, and geographic factors associated with uncertainty in ACS median household income estimates.
- To assess the impact of data quality variations on the reliability of cross-sectional analyses.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 2006-2010 ACS median household income estimates at the census tract scale.
- Employed multivariate spatial regression models to analyze patterns of uncertainty.
- Controlled for the number of responses in the analysis.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in uncertainty patterns were observed between the northern and southern United States, and between suburban and urban core areas.
- Uncertainty was consistently lower in northern US regions and urban cores compared to southern regions and suburbs.
- Higher uncertainty was associated with areas exhibiting lower household incomes, even after controlling for response rates.
Conclusions:
- Data quality of the ACS is not uniform across geographic areas, exhibiting distinct spatial and demographic patterns.
- Variations in ACS estimate quality challenge the reliability of cross-sectional analyses, both within and across regions.
- Awareness of these data quality issues is essential for users, necessitating careful consideration and potential methodological adjustments for accurate research and policy implications.
Related Concept Videos
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Estimating Population Standard Deviation
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...

