Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

814
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
814
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion01:24

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

664
Visualize a drone, with its propellers spinning rapidly, hovering mid-air. The fascinating movements and operations of this drone can be comprehended by applying the principle of general plane motion.
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
664
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

1.0K
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
1.0K
Planar Rigid-Body Motion01:22

Planar Rigid-Body Motion

1.3K
Understanding the movement of a rigid body in planar motion involves recognizing that every particle within this body is traversing a path that maintains a consistent distance from a specific plane. This concept is fundamental in the study of physics and mechanical engineering, and it allows us to comprehend better how objects move in space.
Planar motion is typically divided into three distinct categories. The first is rectilinear translation, demonstrated by a subway train that moves along...
1.3K
Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

29.6K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
29.6K
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

1000
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
1000

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Geometric decompositions of collective motion.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2017
Same author

Symmetry and reduction in collectives: low-dimensional cyclic pursuit.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2016
Same author

Echolocating bats use a nearly time-optimal strategy to intercept prey.

PLoS biology·2006
Same author

Coordinated orbit transfer for satellite clusters.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2004
Same author

Adaptive optics with advanced phase-contrast techniques. II. High-resolution wave-front control.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2001
Same author

Analysis and synthesis of feedforward neural networks using discrete affine wavelet transformations.

IEEE transactions on neural networks·1993
Same journal

Computational modelling distinguishes diverse contributors to aneurysmal progression in the Marfan aorta.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2025
Same journal

Inferring the shape of data: a probabilistic framework for analysing experiments in the natural sciences.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2023
Same journal

The Elbert range of magnetostrophic convection. I. Linear theory.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2022
Same journal

Soft wetting with (a)symmetric Shuttleworth effect.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2022
Same journal

The quantum theory of time: a calculus for q-numbers.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2022
Same journal

Integrable nonlinear evolution equations in three spatial dimensions.

Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 16, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K

Optimality, reduction and collective motion.

Eric W Justh1, P S Krishnaprasad2

  • 1Naval Research Laboratory , Washington DC 20375, USA.

Proceedings. Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences
|August 23, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Optimal control principles explain collective animal steering. Strong coupling creates a "master clock" for synchronized movement, while weaker coupling shows proportional steering, mimicking observed imitative behaviors in aggregations.

Keywords:
Poisson structurecollective behaviourexplicit integrabilitymaximum principleoptimal controlsymmetry reduction

More Related Videos

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

13.2K
Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 16, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
09:46

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions

Published on: May 10, 2012

13.2K
Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.9K

Area of Science:

  • Collective dynamics
  • Optimal control theory
  • Mathematical physics

Background:

  • Agent-based models in collective behavior.
  • Group motion dynamics on Lie groups, specifically SE(2).
  • Optimal control problems in multi-agent systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate optimal control problems for self-steering agents.
  • Analyze the dynamics on the N-fold direct product of SE(2).
  • Explore the role of interaction strength (coupling parameter) in collective steering.

Main Methods:

  • Formulation of symmetric optimal control problems.
  • Reduction of Hamiltonian systems to Lie-Poisson dynamics.
  • Analysis of strong coupling limits and finite coupling strengths.

Main Results:

  • The Hamiltonian system for optimality conditions reduces to a Lie-Poisson system.
  • Strong coupling reveals hidden symmetry, enabling explicit integration and a 'master clock' for identical steering.
  • Special solutions with proportional steering controls exist for finite coupling.

Conclusions:

  • Optimality principles offer a framework for understanding collective steering.
  • The 'master clock' phenomenon in strong coupling explains synchronized movement.
  • Proportional steering controls at finite coupling may explain imitative behaviors in animal aggregations.