Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Validation of the alternating conditional estimation algorithm for estimation of flexible extensions of Cox's
Willy Wynant1, Michal Abrahamowicz2,3
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A2, Canada.
Abstract:
Standard optimization algorithms for maximizing likelihood may not be applicable to the estimation of those flexible multivariable models that are nonlinear in their parameters. For applications where the model's structure permits separating estimation of mutually exclusive subsets of parameters into distinct steps, we propose the alternating conditional estimation (ACE) algorithm. We validate the algorithm, in simulations, for estimation of two flexible extensions of Cox's proportional hazards model where the standard maximum partial likelihood estimation does not apply, with simultaneous modeling of (1) nonlinear and time-dependent effects of continuous covariates on the hazard, and (2) nonlinear interaction and main effects of the same variable. We also apply the algorithm in real-life analyses to estimate nonlinear and time-dependent effects of prognostic factors for mortality in colon cancer. Analyses of both simulated and real-life data illustrate good statistical properties of the ACE algorithm and its ability to yield new potentially useful insights about the data structure.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Determination of Expected Frequency
Hazard Rate

