Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
[Local approval procedures act as a brake on RCTs]
E P van der Stok1, J Huiskens, B Hemmes
1Erasmus MC Kankerinstituut, afd. Chirurgische Oncologie, Rotterdam.
Local approval procedures for multicentre clinical trials in the Netherlands show significant variation. This unpredictability in processing times, documentation, and costs hinders research, highlighting the need for national standardization.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Large multicentre randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Netherlands face challenges due to significant local variations in approval processes.
- Previous reports noted differences in processing times and documentation, but costs and mandatory requirements were less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the aspects of local approval procedures for two oncological multicentre RCTs.
- To assess processing times, documentation requirements, and associated costs for obtaining trial approval.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, descriptive study evaluated local approval procedures for the CAIRO5 and CHARISMA trials.
- Data collected included time intervals between Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC) and Board of Directors (RvB) approval, document types/numbers, and charged costs.
Main Results:
- The median time from METC to RvB approval was 90 days (range: 4-312 days).
- Document requirements varied from 6-20 per centre, and costs ranged from €0-€1750, totaling €8575 across all procedures.
- Most centres did not charge any costs.
Conclusions:
- Approval procedures for multicentre clinical trials in the Netherlands exhibit considerable heterogeneity.
- Unpredictable processing times, documentation demands, and costs necessitate greater uniformity for efficient clinical trial conduct.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Blind Procedures