Cancer network activity associated with therapeutic response and synergism
Jordi Serra-Musach1, Francesca Mateo1, Eva Capdevila-Busquets2
1Breast Cancer and Systems Biology Lab, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), Gran via 199, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, 08908, Catalonia, Spain.
Background:
Cancer patients often show no or only modest benefit from a given therapy. This major problem in oncology is generally attributed to the lack of specific predictive biomarkers, yet a global measure of cancer cell activity may support a comprehensive mechanistic understanding of therapy efficacy. We reasoned that network analysis of omic data could help to achieve this goal.
Methods:
A measure of "cancer network activity" (CNA) was implemented based on a previously defined network feature of communicability. The network nodes and edges corresponded to human proteins and experimentally identified interactions, respectively. The edges were weighted proportionally to the expression of the genes encoding for the corresponding proteins and relative to the number of direct interactors. The gene expression data corresponded to the basal conditions of 595 human cancer cell lines. Therapeutic responses corresponded to the impairment of cell viability measured by the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 130 drugs approved or under clinical development. Gene ontology, signaling pathway, and transcription factor-binding annotations were taken from public repositories. Predicted synergies were assessed by determining the viability of four breast cancer cell lines and by applying two different analytical methods.
Results:
The effects of drug classes were associated with CNAs formed by different cell lines. CNAs also differentiate target families and effector pathways. Proteins that occupy a central position in the network largely contribute to CNA. Known key cancer-associated biological processes, signaling pathways, and master regulators also contribute to CNA. Moreover, the major cancer drivers frequently mediate CNA and therapeutic differences. Cell-based assays centered on these differences and using uncorrelated drug effects reveals novel synergistic combinations for the treatment of breast cancer dependent on PI3K-mTOR signaling.
Conclusions:
Cancer therapeutic responses can be predicted on the basis of a systems-level analysis of molecular interactions and gene expression. Fundamental cancer processes, pathways, and drivers contribute to this feature, which can also be exploited to predict precise synergistic drug combinations.
Insights
A new "cancer network activity" (CNA) measure predicts patient response to cancer therapies by analyzing molecular interactions and gene expression. This approach identifies novel synergistic drug combinations for improved cancer treatment outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Systems biology
- Oncology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Cancer therapy efficacy is limited by a lack of predictive biomarkers.
- A systems-level understanding of cancer cell activity is needed to improve treatment outcomes.
- Network analysis of omic data offers a potential approach to measure global cancer cell activity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement a "cancer network activity" (CNA) measure using network analysis of omic data.
- To investigate the relationship between CNA and therapeutic responses in cancer cell lines.
- To identify novel synergistic drug combinations for cancer treatment.
Main Methods:
- Calculated CNA based on protein-protein interactions and gene expression data from 595 cancer cell lines.
- Assessed therapeutic responses using IC50 values for 130 drugs.
- Utilized Gene Ontology, pathway, and transcription factor annotations.
- Validated predicted synergies through cell-based assays.
Main Results:
- CNA correlated with the effects of different drug classes and differentiated target families/effector pathways.
- Central proteins, key cancer processes, signaling pathways, and master regulators contributed significantly to CNA.
- Major cancer drivers influenced CNA and therapeutic differences.
- Novel synergistic drug combinations for breast cancer were identified, targeting PI3K-mTOR signaling.
Conclusions:
- Cancer therapeutic responses can be predicted using systems-level analysis of molecular interactions and gene expression.
- Fundamental cancer processes and drivers contribute to CNA.
- CNA can be leveraged to predict synergistic drug combinations for precise cancer therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Therapies
Tumor Immunotherapy


