Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motion-deblurring in human vision.

M J Morgan1, S Benton

  • 1Department of Psychology, University College London, UK.

Nature
|August 3, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human vision can perceive clear shapes of moving objects, unlike cameras. However, this study shows motion doesn't improve all visual tasks, challenging general motion-deblurring theories.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The gut microbiota in adults with cystic fibrosis compared to colorectal cancer.

Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society·2023
Same author

The increasing burden of the 2-week wait colorectal cancer pathway in a single centre: the impact of faecal immunochemical tests.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2023
Same author

Factors limiting quantitative phase retrieval in atomic-resolution differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy using a segmented detector.

Ultramicroscopy·2022
Same author

Lagged recovery of fish spatial distributions following a cold-water perturbation.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Suppressing dynamical diffraction artefacts in differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy of long-range electromagnetic fields via precession.

Ultramicroscopy·2020
Same author

The two-week rule colorectal cancer pathway: an update on recent practice, the unsustainable burden on diagnostics and the role of faecal immunochemical testing.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2020
Same journal

Incoming US science academy chief vows to 'double down' on research.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Author Correction: Synthesis of enantioenriched atropisomers by biocatalytic deracemization.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Electrodeposited self-assembled molecules for perovskite photovoltaics.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Neutrino's nursery found: the 'Shadow Blaster'.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Dementia risk in middle-aged people linked to a blood protein.

Nature·2026
Same journal

Daily briefing: What's really happening with trust in science.

Nature·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Neuroscience
  • Image processing

Background:

  • Photographs blur when capturing moving objects at slow shutter speeds.
  • Human vision typically compensates for motion blur, suggesting specialized deblurring mechanisms.
  • Previous research indicated certain spatial discriminations, like vernier hyperacuity, are unaffected by motion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the existence and scope of motion-deblurring mechanisms in human vision.
  • To differentiate between general and specific motion-processing abilities.
  • To challenge existing models of motion deblurring.

Main Methods:

  • Experimentally tested human observers' ability to perform two types of hyperacuity tasks under conditions of retinal image motion.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured performance on vernier acuity (line offset discrimination) with and without motion.
  • Measured performance on spatial interval acuity (parallel line distance discrimination) with and without motion.

    • Main Results:

    • Confirmed that vernier acuity remains high even with significant retinal image motion (up to 3 deg s-1).
    • Demonstrated that spatial interval acuity is significantly impaired by the same level of motion.
    • These contrasting results indicate that motion does not benefit all visual spatial discriminations.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings argue against a universal motion-deblurring mechanism in human vision.
    • The resilience of vernier acuity to motion may be explained by alternative factors, not a general deblurring process.
    • This research refines our understanding of how the visual system processes moving stimuli and spatial information.