Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Primary and key secondary results from the ROCKET AF trial, and their implications on clinical practice
1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Background:
The safety and efficacy of the oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban were studied in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF trial). A number of subanalyses of the ROCKET AF trial have subsequently analyzed the use of rivaroxaban in special patient populations.
Methods:
The outcomes of the ROCKET AF trial were reviewed. The use of rivaroxaban in higher risk populations, as determined by the presence of co-morbidities included in the CHADS2 criteria, was analyzed. Requirements for dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment and in East Asian patients were described. Finally, clinical management challenges, including interruptions in therapy, drug discontinuation, management of bleeding events, drug interactions, and management of patients requiring cardioversion/ablation were reviewed.
Results:
Rivaroxaban is efficacious in high-risk populations, including elderly patients, patients with diabetes, heart failure, history of stroke, prior myocardial infarction, or peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Patients with PAD have a higher risk of bleeding with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin. East Asian populations do not require a dose adjustment for rivaroxaban, while a reduced dose of 15 mg daily is required for patients with moderate renal impairment. Rivaroxaban remains effective with temporary interruptions in therapy and in patients requiring cardioversion/ablation. Rates of major bleeding and subsequent outcomes were similar in patients on warfarin and rivaroxaban, although rates of gastrointestinal bleeding were higher with rivaroxaban. Concurrent use of antiarrhythmic therapy was not associated with adverse outcomes.
Conclusions:
Rivaroxaban represents an efficacious alternative to warfarin in high-risk patients with AF. Dose adjustment is required for patients with moderate renal impairment. Rivaroxaban can be used safely in a number of challenging clinical management scenarios although the concurrent use of amiodarone requires more study.
Insights
Rivaroxaban is an effective alternative to warfarin for high-risk atrial fibrillation patients. It is safe in various clinical situations, though moderate renal impairment requires dose adjustment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- The ROCKET AF trial evaluated rivaroxaban, an oral anticoagulant, against warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF).
- Subanalyses explored rivaroxaban's use in specific patient groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review rivaroxaban's efficacy and safety in high-risk AF populations.
- To analyze dose adjustments and clinical management strategies for rivaroxaban.
Main Methods:
- Review of ROCKET AF trial outcomes.
- Analysis of rivaroxaban use in patients with CHADS2 comorbidities.
- Description of dose adjustments for renal impairment and East Asian patients.
- Review of clinical management challenges.
Main Results:
- Rivaroxaban is effective in high-risk AF patients (elderly, diabetic, heart failure, stroke history, MI, PAD).
- Higher bleeding risk observed with rivaroxaban in PAD patients compared to warfarin.
- No dose adjustment needed for East Asians; 15 mg daily for moderate renal impairment.
- Rivaroxaban effective during therapy interruptions and for cardioversion/ablation.
- Similar major bleeding rates but higher GI bleeding with rivaroxaban versus warfarin.
Conclusions:
- Rivaroxaban is an effective alternative to warfarin for high-risk AF patients.
- Dose adjustment is necessary for moderate renal impairment.
- Rivaroxaban is safe in challenging clinical scenarios, but amiodarone interaction needs further study.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
10:35A Blood-based Test for the Detection of ROS1 and RET Fusion Transcripts from Circulating Ribonucleic Acid Using Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: April 5, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...