Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Arterial access and arteriotomy site closure devices
1The Duke Clinical Research Institute, 508 Fulton Street (111A), Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA.
Insights
Percutaneous transradial access in cardiac catheterization offers benefits like reduced bleeding and faster recovery compared to femoral access. While studies suggest improved survival, the exact reasons for radial access mortality reduction remain unclear.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Access Techniques
Background:
- Arterial access and hemostasis are critical in cardiac catheterization procedures.
- Historical evolution of arterial access methods from surgical cut-down to percutaneous techniques.
- Shift in preference towards percutaneous femoral artery access (Seldinger and Judkins techniques).
Observation:
- Percutaneous transradial access (TRA) compared to femoral access shows reduced bleeding, faster ambulation, and enhanced patient comfort.
- Large randomized trials indicate a survival advantage for TRA in acute coronary syndromes.
- Inconsistencies and uncertainty regarding the mechanism of mortality reduction with TRA persist.
Findings:
- Femoral artery hemostasis achieved via manual compression or vascular closure devices; active closure systems show improved outcomes.
- Radial artery hemostasis utilizes wristbands for non-occlusive compression, reducing radial artery occlusion risk.
- Ongoing research into novel arterial access routes and closure methods for large-bore devices.
Implications:
- Transradial access presents significant advantages in patient recovery and safety for cardiac catheterization.
- Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms behind the observed survival benefits of TRA.
- Proficiency in both radial and femoral artery access is crucial for interventional cardiologists.
Abstract:
Arterial access and haemostasis are fundamental aspects of procedures performed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The first description of arterial access for cardiac catheterization was in 1948, when surgical cut-down was used to access the radial artery. Over the next 2 decades, the preferred arteriotomy method transitioned from the Sones approach of brachial artery cut-down to the Seldinger and Judkins technique of percutaneous femoral artery access. Compared with the femoral approach, percutaneous transradial access results in reduced access-site bleeding, faster time to ambulation, and greater patient comfort. Several large-scale, randomized trials have also reported a survival advantage in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with radial compared with femoral access. However, inconsistencies exist between the completed trials, and the underlying mechanism of a reduction in mortality with radial access is uncertain. Femoral artery haemostasis can be achieved with either manual compression or vascular closure devices, with recent studies suggesting improved outcomes with the use of active closure systems. Radial artery haemostasis is achieved through the use of wristbands that mimic manual compression, and 'non-occlusive' haemostasis reduces the risk of radial artery occlusion. Newer arterial access routes and closure approaches for large-bore devices are being actively investigated. Expertise in both femoral and radial artery access and intervention is essential for contemporary interventional cardiologists.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management

