Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Social Support Groups in the Maintenance of Glycemic Control after Community-Based Intervention
Claire Townsend Ing1, Guangxing Zhang2, Adrienne Dillard2
1Department of Native Hawaiian Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, 651 Ilalo Street, MEB 307L, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
Adding a social support group (SSG) after diabetes self-management education (DSME) helped Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders maintain health improvements. While both groups maintained glycemic control, the SSG group showed reduced systolic blood pressure.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Diabetes Management
- Health Disparities
Background:
- Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders (NH/PI) exhibit higher type 2 diabetes prevalence.
- Culturally tailored diabetes self-management education (DSME) interventions like Partners in Care (PIC) show initial effectiveness.
- Sustaining improvements from DSME remains a challenge, with social support groups (SSG) being a potential solution.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of a diabetes-specific SSG component on maintaining improvements after a DSME intervention.
- To compare the effects of SSG versus a control group on glycemic control, self-care behaviors, and other health markers in NH/PI adults with type 2 diabetes.
Main Methods:
- A 3-month PIC DSME intervention was delivered to 47 NH/PI adults with type 2 diabetes.
- Participants were randomized to a 3-month, 6-session SSG or a control group.
- Key outcomes including HbA1c, blood pressure, lipids, and diabetes self-management knowledge/behaviors were assessed at baseline, 3, and 6 months.
Main Results:
- Significant improvements in HbA1c, diabetes self-management knowledge, and behaviors were observed from baseline to 3 months for all participants.
- No significant differences between SSG and control groups were found from 3 to 6 months, indicating sustained improvements for all.
- The SSG group demonstrated a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure from 3 to 6 months, unlike the control group.
Conclusions:
- The Partners in Care DSME intervention effectively improved glycemic control and self-care behaviors in NH/PI adults.
- Adding a diabetes-specific social support group did not yield additional benefits in maintaining glycemic control or self-care behaviors compared to a control group.
- Social support groups may offer specific benefits, such as reduced systolic blood pressure, which warrants further investigation in diabetes maintenance strategies.
More Related Videos
07:22Glycemic Impact on Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms on Physical, Radiographic, and Inflammatory Markers among Individuals Aged 50 and Over with Diabetes
Published on: March 7, 2025
12:59Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
Published on: July 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Healthcare Agencies I
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...