Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measuring merit in animal research.

R Dresser

    Theoretical Medicine
    |March 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary

    Merit review for animal experimentation faces ethical challenges. This essay explores problems and reforms in scientific project assessment to improve ethical standards.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Research subjects' voices: the missing element in research ethics.

    Anaesthesia and intensive care·2015
    Same author

    Preferences for return of incidental findings from genome sequencing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.

    Clinical genetics·2015
    Same author

    A MODIFIED METHOD OF OBTAINING LARGE AMOUNTS OF RICKETTSIA PROWAZEKI BY ROENTGEN IRRADIATION OF RATS.

    The Journal of experimental medicine·2009
    Same author

    Weighing the benefits of new Alzheimer's treatments.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2007
    Same author

    Dementia research: ethics and policy for the twenty-first century.

    Georgia law review (Athens, Ga. : 1966)·2004
    Same author

    Procreation and punishment.

    The Hastings Center report·2003

    Area of Science:

    • Ethics in Scientific Research
    • Animal Experimentation Oversight

    Background:

    • Ethical considerations are paramount in scientific research involving animals.
    • The merit review process is central to the debate on animal experimentation ethics.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine conceptual, regulatory, and practical issues within the scientific merit review process.
    • To discuss current challenges and proposed reforms for the merit review system.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of the merit review process.
    • Review of regulatory frameworks governing animal experimentation.
    • Discussion of practical challenges and ethical considerations.

    Main Results:

    • Identified inherent conceptual, regulatory, and practical problems in the merit review system.
    • Highlighted contemporary challenges impacting the ethical assessment of animal research.

    Conclusions:

    • The merit review process requires reform to address ethical concerns in animal experimentation.
    • Legal and political factors are crucial for the future of merit assessment in scientific research.
    Keywords:
    Biomedical and Behavioral Research

    Related Experiment Videos