Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

17.4K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
17.4K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

7.2K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
7.2K
Modern Molecular Taxonomy01:29

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

815
Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...
815
Genomics02:02

Genomics

41.5K
Genomics is the science of genomes: it is the study of all the genetic material of an organism. In humans, the genome consists of information carried in 23 pairs of chromosomes in the nucleus, as well as mitochondrial DNA. In genomics, both coding and non-coding DNA is sequenced and analyzed. Genomics allows a better understanding of all living things, their evolution, and their diversity. It has a myriad of uses: for example, to build phylogenetic trees, to improve productivity and...
41.5K
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

19.1K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
19.1K
Applications of Molecular Taxonomy01:20

Applications of Molecular Taxonomy

648
Molecular taxonomy has revolutionized the understanding and classification of bacteria, providing precise insights into their diversity, evolutionary relationships, and ecological roles. By utilizing molecular techniques such as DNA sequencing and fingerprinting, researchers have made significant strides in various fields related to bacterial studies.Resolving Taxonomic AmbiguitiesMolecular taxonomy has been instrumental in distinguishing closely related bacterial species initially thought to...
648

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantitative detection of gut microbial eukaryotes with EukDetect2 reveals global distribution of commensal protists and association with distinct microbial community structure.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Expanding vaginal microbiome pangenomes via a custom MIDAS database reveals <i>Lactobacillus crispatus</i> accessory genes associated with cervical dysplasia.

mSystems·2026
Same author

Linkage of nucleotide and functional diversity varies across gut bacteria.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Gut microbiome-dependent IL-1 signaling is a mediator of ACVR1<sup>R206H</sup>-driven heterotopic ossification.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Machine learning-predicted chromatin organization landscape across pediatric tumors.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Structural variants in human congenital heart disease disrupt distal genomic regulatory contacts of developmental genes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage
08:43

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage

Published on: January 13, 2017

19.2K

Toward Accurate and Quantitative Comparative Metagenomics.

Stephen Nayfach1, Katherine S Pollard2

  • 1Integrative Program in Quantitative Biology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.

Cell
|August 28, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Shotgun metagenomics needs comparable data summaries for accurate microbial community analysis. Improving data standardization and analysis tools will unlock the full potential of microbiome research.

More Related Videos

Purifying the Impure: Sequencing Metagenomes and Metatranscriptomes from Complex Animal-associated Samples
11:23

Purifying the Impure: Sequencing Metagenomes and Metatranscriptomes from Complex Animal-associated Samples

Published on: December 22, 2014

37.8K
Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

31.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage
08:43

Metagenomic Analysis of Silage

Published on: January 13, 2017

19.2K
Purifying the Impure: Sequencing Metagenomes and Metatranscriptomes from Complex Animal-associated Samples
11:23

Purifying the Impure: Sequencing Metagenomes and Metatranscriptomes from Complex Animal-associated Samples

Published on: December 22, 2014

37.8K
Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

31.4K

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Shotgun metagenomics and computational analysis are key for comparing microbial communities.
  • Understanding microbial roles in human biology and environments requires comparable quantitative data summaries across studies.
  • Current data comparability is limited by non-standard abundance statistics and experimental biases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify challenges hindering accurate comparative metagenomics.
  • To propose solutions for improving data comparability and integration in microbiome studies.
  • To envision a future of replicable microbiome research and effective microbiome medicine.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing shotgun metagenomics for taxonomic and functional profiling.
  • Applying computational analysis to microbial community data.
  • Identifying biases in experimental protocols and data-cleaning approaches.

Main Results:

  • Current abundance statistics do not estimate meaningful microbial community parameters.
  • Experimental protocols and data-cleaning introduce significant biases.
  • Lack of standardization hampers cross-study comparability.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing challenges in study design, data access, metadata standardization, and analysis tools is crucial for accurate comparative metagenomics.
  • Future microbiome studies must be replicable and easily integrated with existing data.
  • Realizing the potential of metagenomics for predictive modeling, association studies, and medicine requires these improvements.