Percutaneous transhepatic versus EUS-guided gallbladder drainage for malignant cystic duct obstruction

Jin Ho Choi1, Hyoung Woo Kim2, Jong-Chan Lee2

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Insights

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) offers a safe and effective alternative to percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) for managing malignant cystic duct obstruction, improving quality of life in non-surgical candidates.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Interventional Endoscopy
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Malignant cystic duct obstruction can cause acute cholecystitis or gallbladder hydrops.
  • Surgery is often not an option for these patients.
  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is an emerging palliative treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and safety of EUS-GBD with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD).
  • To evaluate EUS-GBD as a palliative management strategy for malignant cystic duct obstruction.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 14 patients treated with EUS-GBD (covered metal stents).
  • Comparison with 19 patients treated with PTGBD for similar conditions.
  • Analysis of technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and stent patency.

Main Results:

  • EUS-GBD achieved technical success in 85.7% and clinical success in 91.7%.
  • PTGBD had 100% technical success and 86.4% clinical success.
  • Adverse event rates were similar (28.5% for EUS-GBD, 21.1% for PTGBD).
  • EUS-GBD demonstrated longer stent patency without need for re-intervention before death.

Conclusions:

  • EUS-GBD is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment for malignant cystic duct obstruction in non-surgical patients.
  • EUS-GBD can improve the long-term quality of life for patients with advanced cancer.
Abstract