Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026
Sperm Collection of Differential Quality Using Density Gradient Centrifugation
Published on: November 29, 2018
Removing seminal plasma improves bovine sperm sex-sorting
C B Steinhauser1, J K Graham1, R W Lenz2
1Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Abstract:
Bull ejaculates with sperm concentrations of less than 1 billion sperm sort poorly for sex chromosomes, but whether this is because of the sperm concentration or the concomitant seminal plasma content has not been elucidated. Experiments were conducted to determine why ejaculates with lower sperm concentrations sort poorly and develop a protocol to increase sorting efficiency. In Experiment I, spermatozoa at 160 or 240 × 106 sperm/mL were stained at 49, 65 or 81 μm Hoechst 33342 with 0 or 10% seminal plasma and then sex-sorted. In Experiment II, seminal plasma was adjusted to create samples with sperm concentrations of 0.7, 1.4 and 2.1 × 109 sperm/mL, prior to sex-sorting. In Experiment III, spermatozoa were diluted to 0.7, 1.4 and 2.1 × 109 sperm/mL using TALP containing 0 or 10% seminal plasma prior to sex-sorting and cryopreservation. In Experiment I, the optimal staining combination was 160 × 106 sperm/mL stained with 65 μm Hoechst 33342 and no seminal plasma. In Experiment II, the percentages of membrane-impaired sperm were lower for sample concentrations of 2.1 × 109 sperm/mL (15%) than for samples at 1.4 × 109 (17%) or 0.7 × 109 sperm/mL (18%; p < 0.01). The X sort rate was slower for samples stored at 0.7 × 109 sperm/mL (3.45 × 103 sperm/sec) than for samples stored at 1.4 × 109 and 2.1 × 109 sperm/mL (3.85 and 3.94 × 103 sperm/sec, respectively; p < 0.05). In Experiment III, samples containing 0% seminal plasma had higher percentages of live-oriented cells (54 vs. 50%; p < 0.05), fewer dead sperm (19 vs. 22%; p < 0.01) and higher post-thaw motility (41 vs. 35%; p < 0.05) than samples containing 10% seminal plasma. Ejaculates with high sperm concentrations result in superior sorting because these samples have less seminal plasma during staining than ejaculates with lower initial sperm concentrations as all samples are diluted to 160 × 106 sperm/mL for staining. Therefore, sorting efficiency appears to be affected by seminal plasma concentration, not by the original sperm concentration.
