Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

317
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
317
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.7K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

113.2K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
113.2K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

16.8K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
16.8K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

10.0K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
10.0K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of Human Melanoma Single Cell Profiles to Evolutionary Medicine Model Xiphophorus Provides Insights in Disease Control.

Pigment cell & melanoma research·2026
Same author

Global mobility flows and COVID-19 spread in Europe during the emergency phase: Insights from Meta-Facebook data.

Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology·2026
Same author

Agricultural pesticide use and Alzheimer's disease dementia prevalence across US counties in a mixed supervised-unsupervised analysis.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

CD155 links tumor immunotype to epithelial-directed precision therapy beyond checkpoint inhibition in cervical cancer.

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer·2026
Same author

Diagnostic testing intensity for Legionnaires' disease: Spatio-temporal assessment and its effect on surveillance case reporting, Denmark, 2014-2022.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Saruparib in combination with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: EvoPAR-Prostate01.

Future oncology (London, England)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K

Multiscale measurement error models for aggregated small area health data.

Mehreteab Aregay1, Andrew B Lawson2, Christel Faes3

  • 1Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Public Health Sciences, MUSC, Charleston, SC, USA aregay@musc.edu.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|August 28, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Multiscale measurement error models improve spatial data analysis by accounting for aggregation effects. These models provide unbiased parameter estimates and better model fit compared to standard multiscale approaches.

Keywords:
Measurement errorconvolution modelsmultiscale modelsscaling effectshared random effects

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

11.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

11.2K

Area of Science:

  • Spatial statistics
  • Geographical information systems
  • Health data analysis

Background:

  • Spatial data aggregation from finer to coarser geographical levels causes scaling effects, smoothing data variation.
  • Multiscale models address scaling by linking convolution models across different levels using shared random effects.
  • Investigating predictor-outcome relationships across geographical levels is crucial for aggregated health data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Extend multiscale models to assess if predictor effects at finer geographical levels persist at coarser levels.
  • Incorporate measurement error models within the multiscale framework to adjust for aggregation-induced predictor uncertainty.
  • Evaluate the performance and benefits of multiscale measurement error models against standard multiscale models.

Main Methods:

  • Applied multiscale models incorporating measurement error models to spatial data.
  • Compared performance using real and simulated datasets.
  • Investigated the impact of ignoring measurement error on regression coefficients and random effect variances.

Main Results:

  • Ignoring measurement error in multiscale models led to underestimation of regression coefficients.
  • Overestimation of the variance of spatially structured random effects was observed when measurement error was ignored.
  • Accounting for measurement error resulted in improved model fit and unbiased parameter estimates.

Conclusions:

  • Multiscale measurement error models offer a more accurate approach for analyzing aggregated spatial data.
  • Addressing predictor uncertainty due to aggregation is essential for reliable spatial epidemiological studies.
  • The proposed method enhances the understanding of geographical relationships in health data across multiple scales.