Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026
Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
Published on: September 11, 2019
Perspectives on Postural Control Dysfunction to Inform Future Research: A Delphi Study for Children With Cerebral
Rosalee Dewar1, Andrew P Claus1, Kylie Tucker2
1School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Objective:
To identify whether consensus can be achieved in how clinicians and researchers define, describe, assess, and treat postural control dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy (CP).
Design:
Delphi study with 3 iterative rounds.
Setting:
Electronic survey.
Participants:
Researchers and/or clinicians (N=43) from 7 countries with a mean ± SD of 20±11 years of experience working with children with CP participated. Participants included authors of published works on postural control in CP (identified from a recent systematic review), members of the Australasian Academy of CP and Developmental Medicine, and 2 major Australian rehabilitation providers.
Interventions:
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures:
The Delphi study consisted of 3 iterative rounds of surveys. In Round 1, respondents answered open-ended questions regarding their views on (1) definition items for postural control, (2) theoretical frameworks, (3) methods for assessment, and (4) interventions for postural control dysfunction in children with CP. Rounds 2 and 3 were made up of items generated by participants in Round 1 and combined with items identified from the literature. Participants indicated their level of agreement for each item on a 7-point Likert scale. Threshold for consensus was ≥85% agreement.
Results:
Of 306 items generated, 174 reached consensus by Round 3. Most postural control definition items (90%) achieved consensus. Two theoretical frameworks (14%) reached consensus. Less than half (42%) of assessment items reached consensus. More individual assessment items (89%) reached consensus than multi-item tools (4%). Just over half (61%) of the items generated for interventions reached consensus.
Conclusion:
Consensus was achieved for a postural control definition. However, substantial research is needed to establish a comprehensive, postural control-specific framework and suite of assessments. These would provide a foundation to improve intervention selection and dosage.
